These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
374 related items for PubMed ID: 11963434
1. Report cards don't make the grade with physicians or consumers. Healthc Benchmarks; 2002 Apr; 9(4):37-9. PubMed ID: 11963434 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Lousy report card? Most consumers don't pay attention. Hochhauser M. Manag Care Q; 2003 Apr; 11(3):28-9. PubMed ID: 14983649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How consumers evaluate health care quality: Part III. Moore ST, Bopp KD. Health Mark Q; 1999 Apr; 17(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11010207 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Can consumers understand managed care report cards? Hochhauser M. Manag Care Interface; 1998 Nov; 11(11):91-5. PubMed ID: 10187422 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Health care consumers say they want to know more objective measures about quality. Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 2001 Apr; 13(4):12-3, 1. PubMed ID: 11330225 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Managed care report cards: evaluating those who evaluate physicians. Kaplan JG, Bauers JC, Beloff S, Tindall WN. Manag Care Interface; 2000 Jun; 13(6):88-94. PubMed ID: 11183019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician urges providers to use report cards to compare performance of health plans. Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1999 Mar; 3(3):39-40, 33. PubMed ID: 10387416 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Physician report cards more prevalent among MCOs, but do they work? Manag Care Strateg; 1998 Dec; 6(12):137-9. PubMed ID: 10351376 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of benchmarking in quality management. Spoeri RK. J Healthc Resour Manag; 1997 Dec; 15(10):28-9. PubMed ID: 10176190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A new generation of report cards is forcing health plans and providers to strive for better grades. Weber DO. Healthc Strateg; 1998 Jun; 2(6):1-7. PubMed ID: 10346002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Physician profiling: it's here, get used to it. Med Netw Strategy Rep; 1998 Oct; 7(10):1-7. PubMed ID: 10187148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Making the grade: update on report card initiatives for 1997. Bartlett J, Kaufmann C, Manderscheid R, Hall LL, Kramer TL, Daniels AS, O'Kane ME. Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 1997 Apr; 6(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 10166631 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. What information do consumers want and how will they use it? Ware JE. Med Care; 1995 Jan; 33(1 Suppl):JS25-30. PubMed ID: 7823654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Making the grade: a status report on hospital report cards. Health Syst Rev; 1997 Jan; 30(5):11-4. PubMed ID: 10173709 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The employer's role in quality. Companies must work harder to make pay-for-performance work for everyone. Webber A. Mod Healthc; 2005 Jul 25; 35(30):20. PubMed ID: 16101251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How consumers evaluate health care quality: Part II. Moore ST, Bopp KD. Health Mark Q; 1999 Jul 25; 17(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11066719 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Competing in a report-card environment. Coile RC. Russ Coiles Health Trends; 2002 Oct 25; 14(12):1, 4-9. PubMed ID: 12387203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Balancing the health care scorecard. Shutt JA. Manag Care; 2003 Sep 25; 12(9):42-6. PubMed ID: 14528673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]