These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Influence of tip wear of piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers on root surface roughness at different working parameters. A profilometric and atomic force microscopy study. Arabaci T, Cicek Y, Dilsiz A, Erdogan İY, Kose O, Kizildağ A. Int J Dent Hyg; 2013 Feb; 11(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23033943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the safety and efficiency of novel metallic ultrasonic scaler tip on titanium surfaces. Baek SH, Shon WJ, Bae KS, Kum KY, Lee WC, Park YS. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1269-74. PubMed ID: 22093039 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth (II). Subgingival roughness. Kocher T, Rosin M, Langenbeck N, Bernhardt O. J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Aug; 28(8):723-9. PubMed ID: 11442731 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument. Busslinger A, Lampe K, Beuchat M, Lehmann B. J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 28(7):642-9. PubMed ID: 11422585 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomised controlled trial to determine patient experience of a magnetostrictive stack scaler as compared to a piezoelectric scaler, in supportive periodontal therapy. Daly S, Newcombe RG, Claydon NCA, Seong J, Davies M, West NX. J Dent; 2020 Feb; 93():103279. PubMed ID: 31931025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy. Park JB, Kim N, Ko Y. J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]