These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

173 related items for PubMed ID: 11985049

  • 1. [A new comparison method of HDL-cholesterol measurement for evaluation of routine methods].
    Sakurabayashi I.
    Rinsho Byori; 2002 Mar; 50(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 11985049
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Development of homogeneous assay for HDL-C in serum].
    Sugiuchi H, Okabe H.
    Rinsho Byori; 2002 Mar; 50(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 11985048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of the ratio HDL-cholesterol/total cholesterol on the Reflotron vs. conventional wet chemistry methods.
    Herruer MH, Kluitenberg WE, Zuijderhoudt FM.
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1992 Mar; 30(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 1599979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. With a novel evaluation method comparison of 2 homogeneous assay kits for high density lipoprotein cholesterol.
    Kurosaki Y, Hachimura K, Ogawa Z.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Mar; 401(1-2):110-3. PubMed ID: 19094975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. New HDL-cholesterol reagent formulation reduces interference from samples with abnormal proteins.
    Hoefner DM.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2006 Dec; 374(1-2):142-4. PubMed ID: 16701600
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of two direct methods for HDL cholesterol measurement with an indirect precipitation method in diabetic patients.
    Saeed BO, Smart P, Keeka G, Handley GH, Weaver JU.
    Diabetes Nutr Metab; 2002 Jun; 15(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 12173732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Quality control, quality assessment of laboratory tests, lipid profile.
    Kawano K.
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999 Jun; 30 Suppl 3():110-6. PubMed ID: 10926270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Direct assay method for LDL-cholesterol].
    Yoshino G, Hirano T, Kazumi T.
    Nihon Rinsho; 2001 Feb; 59 Suppl 2():778-87. PubMed ID: 11351690
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Unexpected effect of Lipoclear® (clarifying reagent) on C-reactive protein analysis].
    Grenier A.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2011 Feb; 69(5):620. PubMed ID: 22008145
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of two homogeneous HDL cholesterol methods in a large population study.
    Chittamma A, Roberts WL, Sritara P, Cheepudomwit S, Suriyawongpaisal P, Lolekha PH.
    Clin Biochem; 2004 Sep; 37(9):745-9. PubMed ID: 15329311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Measurement performance of reagent manufacturers by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network lipid standardization specified for metabolic syndrome-focused health checkups program in Japan.
    Nakamura M, Koyama I, Iso H, Sato S, Okazaki M, Kiyama M, Shimamoto T, Konishi M.
    J Atheroscler Thromb; 2009 Sep; 16(6):756-63. PubMed ID: 19763016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cholesterol analyzers.
    Health Devices; 1990 Oct; 19(10):343-71. PubMed ID: 2258306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Measurement of blood cholesterol, decentralized, using a Reflotron, or centralized in a laboratory. A comparison].
    Christensen TE, Agner E, Jensen SE, Jacobsen K, Mahnfeldt MS, Baastrup A.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Nov 05; 152(45):3346-8. PubMed ID: 2238225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of the VITROS 5,1 FS chemistry system in a large pediatric laboratory.
    Herkner K, Reiter-Reisacher R, Sonntag O.
    Clin Lab; 2007 Nov 05; 53(1-2):17-26. PubMed ID: 17323821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of two homogeneous assays with a precipitation method and an ultracentrifugation method for the measurement of HDL-cholesterol.
    Arranz-Peña ML, Tasende-Mata J, Martin-Gil FJ.
    Clin Chem; 1998 Dec 05; 44(12):2499-505. PubMed ID: 9836717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Review and critique of cholesterol methodology.
    Zak B, Epstein E, Baginski ES.
    Ann Clin Lab Sci (1971); 1972 Dec 05; 2(2):101-25. PubMed ID: 4616638
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of two point-of-care lipid analyzers for use in global cardiovascular risk assessments.
    Dale RA, Jensen LH, Krantz MJ.
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 May 05; 42(5):633-9. PubMed ID: 18413684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. False negative results in the Roche assay for HDL-cholesterol.
    Bakker AJ, Zijlstra A, Leemhuis MP.
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2003 Sep 05; 40(Pt 5):572-5. PubMed ID: 14503999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Development of measurement methods and contributions to medical care in the clinical laboratory].
    Sugiuchi H.
    Rinsho Byori; 2008 Jan 05; 56(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18318234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Methods for primary screening and laboratory diagnosis of dyslipidemia. January 2000 Guidelines. Agence Nationale D'accréditation Et D'évaluation En Santé].
    Agence Nationale D'accréditation Et D'évaluation En Santé (ANAES).
    J Mal Vasc; 2002 Oct 05; 27(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 12457129
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.