These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
169 related items for PubMed ID: 11997050
1. Adaptation and gain pool summation: alternative models and masking data. Meese TS, Holmes DJ. Vision Res; 2002 Apr; 42(9):1113-25. PubMed ID: 11997050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Grating and plaid masks indicate linear summation in a contrast gain pool. Holmes DJ, Meese TS. J Vis; 2004 Dec 22; 4(12):1080-9. PubMed ID: 15669912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Area summation and masking. Meese TS. J Vis; 2004 Nov 03; 4(10):930-43. PubMed ID: 15595896 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A common contrast pooling rule for suppression within and between the eyes. Meese TS, Challinor KL, Summers RJ. Vis Neurosci; 2008 Nov 03; 25(4):585-601. PubMed ID: 18764960 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking. Watson AB, Solomon JA. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1997 Sep 03; 14(9):2379-91. PubMed ID: 9291608 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Orientation masking and cross-orientation suppression (XOS): implications for estimates of filter bandwidth. Meese TS, Holmes DJ. J Vis; 2010 Oct 01; 10(12):9. PubMed ID: 21047741 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Binocular contrast interactions: dichoptic masking is not a single process. Baker DH, Meese TS. Vision Res; 2007 Nov 01; 47(24):3096-107. PubMed ID: 17904610 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sinusoid = light bar + dark bar? McIlhagga W, Peterson R. Vision Res; 2006 Jun 01; 46(12):1934-45. PubMed ID: 16469354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of adaptation and masking on incremental thresholds for contrast. Ross J, Speed HD, Morgan MJ. Vision Res; 1993 Oct 01; 33(15):2051-6. PubMed ID: 8266646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial-frequency-tuned mechanisms of the red-green channel estimated by oblique masking. Vimal RP. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2002 Feb 01; 19(2):276-88. PubMed ID: 11822590 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold. Meese TS, Georgeson MA, Baker DH. J Vis; 2006 Oct 23; 6(11):1224-43. PubMed ID: 17209731 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Contextual modulation involves suppression and facilitation from the center and the surround. Meese TS, Summers RJ, Holmes DJ, Wallis SA. J Vis; 2007 Mar 22; 7(4):7. PubMed ID: 17461691 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of background components on spatial-frequency masking. Yang J, Stevenson SB. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1998 May 22; 15(5):1027-35. PubMed ID: 9579054 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Size tuning and contextual modulation of backward contrast masking. Saarela TP, Herzog MH. J Vis; 2009 Oct 22; 9(11):21.1-12. PubMed ID: 20053084 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. On the role of X and simple cells in human contrast processing. Lawton TB, Tyler CW. Vision Res; 1994 Mar 22; 34(5):659-67. PubMed ID: 8160384 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, orientation, field position, and eye of origin. Meese TS, Hess RF. J Vis; 2004 Oct 18; 4(10):843-59. PubMed ID: 15595890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Forward-backward masking of contrast patterns: the role of transients. Foley JM. J Vis; 2011 Aug 25; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 21868481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]