These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

152 related items for PubMed ID: 12002864

  • 21. [Relationship between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and frequency discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears].
    Tanaka Y.
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1996 Jan; 99(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 8822256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Distortion product of otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss].
    Schlögel H, Stephan K, Böheim K, Welzl-Müller K.
    HNO; 1995 Jan; 43(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 7890546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA, Baranowski LG.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Jan; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS, Prieve BA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.
    Dewey JB, Dhar S.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):89-110. PubMed ID: 27681700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Possibility for quantitative and frequency-specific assessment of auditory threshold with otoacoustic emissions].
    Dreher A, Suckfüll M, Schneeweiss S, Schorn K.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jan; 76(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 9156504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM, Phillips DS, Fausti SA, Gordon JS, Helt WJ, Wilmington D, Bratt GW, Konrad-Martin D.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. DPOAE-grams in patients with acute tonal tinnitus.
    Gouveris H, Maurer J, Mann W.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Apr; 132(4):550-3. PubMed ID: 15806043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Human efferent adaptation of DPOAEs in the L1,L2 space.
    Meinke DK, Stagner BB, Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL.
    Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 208(1-2):89-100. PubMed ID: 16019174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP, Nelson K, Davis T, Dorn PA, Neely ST.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Input-output functions for stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adult ears.
    Schairer KS, Fitzpatrick D, Keefe DH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):944-66. PubMed ID: 12942975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Johnson TA, Neely ST, Garner CA, Gorga MP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jan; 119(1):418-28. PubMed ID: 16454296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1,L2 space.
    Whitehead ML, Stagner BB, McCoy MJ, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2359-77. PubMed ID: 7714255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Vonthein R, Zenner HP.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Hearing threshold estimation using concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady-state responses.
    Rosner T, Kandzia F, Oswald JA, Janssen T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):840-51. PubMed ID: 21361442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions provide clues hearing mechanisms in the frog ear.
    Vassilakis PN, Meenderink SW, Narins PM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3713-26. PubMed ID: 15658721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. CD1 hearing-impaired mice. II. Group latencies and optimal f2/f1 ratios of distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and scanning electron microscopy.
    Le Calvez S, Guilhaume A, Romand R, Aran JM, Avan P.
    Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 120(1-2):51-61. PubMed ID: 9667430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. High-Frequency Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Repeatability in a Patient Population.
    Dreisbach L, Zettner E, Chang Liu M, Meuel Fernhoff C, MacPhee I, Boothroyd A.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Jun; 39(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 28678077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM, Feeney MP, Gates GA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Effect of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements at and around 4 kHz.
    Reuven ML, Neely ST, Kopun JG, Rasetshwane DM, Allen JB, Tan H, Gorga MP.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Dec; 34(6):779-88. PubMed ID: 24165303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.