These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

184 related items for PubMed ID: 12014891

  • 1. Neonatal screening for hearing impairment.
    Watkin PM.
    Semin Neonatol; 2001 Dec; 6(6):501-9. PubMed ID: 12014891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.
    Suppiej A, Rizzardi E, Zanardo V, Franzoi M, Ermani M, Orzan E.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry.
    Mathur NN, Dhawan R.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jul; 121(7):639-43. PubMed ID: 17112395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors.
    De Capua B, De Felice C, Costantini D, Bagnoli F, Passali D.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Feb; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12812130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Infant hearing screening: effects of timeline.
    Tsui PW, McPherson B, Wong EC, Ng IH.
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 33(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 18429859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program.
    Kirkim G, Serbetcioglu B, Erdag TK, Ceryan K.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1461-9. PubMed ID: 18674822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns.
    De Capua B, Costantini D, Martufi C, Latini G, Gentile M, De Felice C.
    Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):601-6. PubMed ID: 17307313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Sensitivity of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory brain-stem response in neonatal hearing screening, a comparative study].
    Xu ZM, Li J, Hu TZ, Sun JH, Shen XM.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Feb 25; 83(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 12812641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Screening of high-risk infants using distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Bowes M, Smith C, Tan AK, Varette-Cerre P.
    J Otolaryngol; 1999 Aug 25; 28(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 10461253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Neonatal hearing screening with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in Western Saudi Arabia.
    Habib HS, Abdelgaffar H.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Jun 25; 69(6):839-42. PubMed ID: 15885338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol.
    Johnson JL, White KR, Widen JE, Gravel JS, James M, Kennalley T, Maxon AB, Spivak L, Sullivan-Mahoney M, Vohr BR, Weirather Y, Holstrum J.
    Pediatrics; 2005 Sep 25; 116(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 16140706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [A comparison of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high-risk neonates].
    Xu FL, Xing QJ, Cheng XY.
    Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug 25; 10(4):460-3. PubMed ID: 18706161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Hearing screening for high-risk newborns].
    Zhao PJ, Xu ZM, Wu SH, Jin CH, Yu H, Shen P, Li J, Wang WC, Shen XM.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Feb 25; 83(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 12812643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The results of newborn hearing screening by means of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Wroblewska-Seniuk K, Chojnacka K, Pucher B, Szczapa J, Gadzinowski J, Grzegorowski M.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Oct 25; 69(10):1351-7. PubMed ID: 15904979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening.
    Korres SG, Balatsouras DG, Lyra C, Kandiloros D, Ferekidis E.
    Med Sci Monit; 2006 Jun 25; 12(6):CR260-3. PubMed ID: 16733484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [A combined neonatal hearing screening protocol].
    Almenar Latorre A, Tapia Toca MC, Fernández Pérez C, Moro Serrano M.
    An Esp Pediatr; 2002 Jul 25; 57(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 12139894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs.
    Benito-Orejas JI, Ramírez B, Morais D, Almaraz A, Fernández-Calvo JL.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Aug 25; 72(8):1193-201. PubMed ID: 18550180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Hearing screening of 10,501 newborns].
    Nie WY, Gong LX, Liu YJ, Xiang LL, Lin Q, Qi YS, Nie YJ.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Feb 25; 83(4):274-7. PubMed ID: 12812640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Universal newborn hearing screening: a 27-month experience in the French region of Champagne-Ardenne.
    Lévêque M, Schmidt P, Leroux B, Danvin JB, Langagne T, Labrousse M, Chays A.
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Aug 25; 96(8):1150-4. PubMed ID: 17578491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.