These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

140 related items for PubMed ID: 12017197

  • 1. Conventional tube agglutination with polyethylene glycol versus Red Cell Affinity Column Technology (ReACT): a comparison of antibody detection methods.
    Brumit MC, Stubbs JR.
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2002; 32(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 12017197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of the performance of microtube column systems and solid-phase systems and the tube low-ionic-strength solution additive indirect antiglobulin test in the detection of red cell alloantibodies.
    Weisbach V, Kohnhäuser T, Zimmermann R, Ringwald J, Strasser E, Zingsem J, Eckstein R.
    Transfus Med; 2006 Aug; 16(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 16879156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Antibody identification using both automated solid-phase red cell adherence assay and a tube polyethylene glycol antiglobulin method.
    Yamada C, Serrano-Rahman L, Vasovic LV, Mohandas K, Uehlinger J.
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1693-8. PubMed ID: 18482178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparative sensitivity of solid phase versus PEG enhancement assays for detection and identification of RBC antibodies.
    Dwyre DM, Erickson Y, Heintz M, Elbert C, Strauss RG.
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2006 Aug; 35(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 16905362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Polyethylene glycol antiglobulin tube versus gel microcolumn: influence on the incidence of delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions and delayed serologic transfusion reactions.
    Winters JL, Richa EM, Bryant SC, Tauscher CD, Bendix BJ, Stubbs JR.
    Transfusion; 2010 Jul; 50(7):1444-52. PubMed ID: 20230534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of recent techniques for detection of red blood cell antibodies in sera of reference samples, patients, pregnant women, and blood donors.
    de Castilho LM, Pellegrino J, Bechelli AP, Le Pennec PY, Mendes NF.
    J Clin Lab Anal; 1996 Jul; 10(5):250-6. PubMed ID: 8887003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of the performance of four microtube column agglutination systems in the detection of red cell alloantibodies.
    Weisbach V, Ziener A, Zimmermann R, Glaser A, Zingsem J, Eckstein R.
    Transfusion; 1999 Oct; 39(10):1045-50. PubMed ID: 10532596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of 2-column agglutination versus conventional tube technique for antibody screening.
    Abou-Jabal A, Shubeilat T, Hajjiri F.
    East Mediterr Health J; 2003 May; 9(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 15751934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of DATs using traditional tube agglutination to gel column and affinity column procedures.
    Dittmar K, Procter JL, Cipolone K, Njoroge JM, Miller J, Stroncek DF.
    Transfusion; 2001 Oct; 41(10):1258-62. PubMed ID: 11606825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Surface decoration of red blood cells with maleimidophenyl-polyethylene glycol facilitated by thiolation with iminothiolane: an approach to mask A, B, and D antigens to generate universal red blood cells.
    Nacharaju P, Boctor FN, Manjula BN, Acharya SA.
    Transfusion; 2005 Mar; 45(3):374-83. PubMed ID: 15752155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Detection of weak D with a fully automated solid-phase red cell adherence system.
    Lai M, Mavilia G, d'Onofrio G, Leone G.
    Transfusion; 2005 May; 45(5):689-93. PubMed ID: 15847655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A modified rapid monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of platelet antigen assay for the detection of human platelet antigen (HPA) antibodies: a multicentre evaluation.
    Campbell K, Rishi K, Howkins G, Gilby D, Mushens R, Ghevaert C, Metcalfe P, Ouwehand WH, Lucas G.
    Vox Sang; 2007 Nov; 93(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 18070271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Implementation of gel column technology, including comparative testing of Ortho ID-MTS with standard polyethylene glycol tube tests.
    Derr DA, Dickerson SJ, Steiner EA.
    Immunohematology; 1998 Nov; 14(2):72-4. PubMed ID: 15377201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia investigation: Comparison between tube test and microcolumn agglutination (gel test) for the detection of drug-dependent antibodies in the presence of soluble drug.
    Nguyen TN, Fihman V, Maenulein E, Vinatier I, Klaren JM.
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2020 Aug; 27(3):133-138. PubMed ID: 32561329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Patient factors associated with unidentified reactivity in solid-phase and polyethylene glycol antibody detection methods.
    Miller NM, Johnson ST, Carpenter E, Naczek CA, Karafin MS.
    Transfusion; 2017 May; 57(5):1288-1293. PubMed ID: 28294343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Gel technique, a new sensitive method for the determination of erythrocyte antibodies. Advantages and disadvantages with introduction of a new method].
    Jensen KD, Brodthagen UA.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Jun 28; 155(26):2055-8. PubMed ID: 8328050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Detection of red cell antibodies: current and future techniques.
    Knight RC, Poole GD.
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1995 Dec 28; 52(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 8555784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.