These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
493 related items for PubMed ID: 12022461
1. The effect of resin composite pins on the retention of class IV restorations. Muhlbauer JA, Dunn WJ, Roberts HW, Murchison DF. Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 12022461 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of resin composite pins to improve retention of Class IV resin composite restorations. Roberts HW, Hermesch CB, Charlton DG. Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 11203830 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer. de Freitas CR, Miranda MI, de Andrade MF, Flores VH, Vaz LG, Guimarães C. Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 12238690 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. Shook LW, Turner EW, Ross J, Scarbecz M. Oper Dent; 2003 Sep; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of reattached incisor fragments with mini fibre-reinforced composite anchors. Fennis WM, Kreulen CM, Wolke JG, Fokkinga WA, Machado C, Creugers NH. J Dent; 2009 Jun; 37(6):462-7. PubMed ID: 19339099 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations. Winkler MM, Moore BK, Rhodes B, Swartz M. Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design. Clausen JO, Abou Tara M, Kern M. Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems. Ramos RP, Chinelatti MA, Chimello DT, Dibb RG. Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Replacement of resin-based composite: evaluation of cavity design, cavity depth, and shade matching. Gordan VV, Mondragon E, Shen C. Quintessence Int; 2002 Apr; 33(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 11989376 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials. Lopes GC, Franke M, Maia HP. J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars. Cubas GB, Camacho GB, Pereira-Cenci T, Nonaka T, Barbin EL. Gen Dent; 2010 Jul; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]