These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


737 related items for PubMed ID: 12033582

  • 1. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F, Kubo HD.
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
    Ding GX, Cygler JE, Kwok CB.
    Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC, Hanson WF.
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
    Gerbi BJ, Antolak JA, Deibel FC, Followill DS, Herman MG, Higgins PD, Huq MS, Mihailidis DN, Yorke ED, Hogstrom KR, Khan FM.
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
    Palmans H, Nafaa L, de Patoul N, Denis JM, Tomsej M, Vynckier S.
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 May 07; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
    Drzymala RE, Alvarez PE, Bednarz G, Bourland JD, DeWerd LA, Ma L, Meltsner SG, Neyman G, Novotny J, Petti PL, Rivard MJ, Shiu AS, Goetsch SJ.
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov 07; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dosimetry study comparing NCS report-2 versus IAEA report TRS-398 for high energy photon beams.
    Attalla EM, Khaled NE, Abou-Elenein HS, Elsayed AA.
    Gulf J Oncolog; 2008 Jan 07; (3):25-31. PubMed ID: 20084794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of AAPM Addendum to TG-51, IAEA TRS-398, and JSMP 12: Calibration of photon beams in water.
    Kinoshita N, Oguchi H, Nishimoto Y, Adachi T, Shioura H, Kimura H, Doi K.
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep 07; 18(5):271-278. PubMed ID: 28771919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Clinical calibration dosimetry in JSMP-01: measurements using Farmer-type cylindrical ion chambers.].
    Araki F, Kumagai K, Yoshiura T, Oura H, Tachibana M, Moribe N, Tajima H, Yoshida A, Kido T.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2005 Sep 07; 25(3):104-13. PubMed ID: 16373986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Modified electron beam output calibration based on IAEA Technical Report Series 398.
    Pawiro SA, Mahfirotin DA, Assegab MI, Wibowo WE.
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Apr 07; 23(4):e13573. PubMed ID: 35226389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 37.