These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

192 related items for PubMed ID: 12033588

  • 1. Measurement of the presampled two-dimensional modulation transfer function of digital imaging systems.
    Fetterly KA, Hangiandreou NJ, Schueler BA, Ritenour ER.
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):913-21. PubMed ID: 12033588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image.
    Buhr E, Günther-Kohfahl S, Neitzel U.
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2323-31. PubMed ID: 14528954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A method for determining the modulation transfer function from thick microwire profiles measured with x-ray microcomputed tomography.
    Nakaya Y, Kawata Y, Niki N, Umetatni K, Ohmatsu H, Moriyama N.
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4347-64. PubMed ID: 22830768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems.
    Flynn MJ, Samei E.
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1612-23. PubMed ID: 10501062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
    Samei E, Buhr E, Granfors P, Vandenbroucke D, Wang X.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug 07; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
    Yokoi T, Takata T, Ichikawa K.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011 Aug 07; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
    Samei E, Flynn MJ.
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr 07; 30(4):608-22. PubMed ID: 12722813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.