These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

269 related items for PubMed ID: 12041182

  • 21. Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr 23; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J.
    Womens Health Issues; 1993 Apr 23; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate.
    Simmons PD.
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993 Apr 23; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Barnes v. Moore.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Fed Report; 1992 Aug 17; 970():12-6. PubMed ID: 11648402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The road not taken: state constitutions as an alternative source of protection for reproductive rights.
    O'Neill KF.
    N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1993 Aug 17; 11(Part 1):1-77. PubMed ID: 11656430
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
    Linton PB.
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993 Aug 17; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH.
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992 Aug 17; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
    Fed Suppl; 1990 Aug 24; 744():1323-98. PubMed ID: 11648591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA.
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993 Aug 24; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the role of stare decisis.
    Laird V.
    Mod Law Rev; 1994 May 24; 57(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 11656439
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The evolution of the right to privacy after Roe v. Wade.
    Barnard D.
    Am J Law Med; 1987 May 24; 13(2 3):365-525. PubMed ID: 11659051
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, en banc.
    Fed Report; 1996 Mar 06; 79():790-859. PubMed ID: 11648417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Karlin v. Foust.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.
    Fed Suppl; 1997 Oct 02; 975():1177-235. PubMed ID: 11648430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    U.S. Supreme Court.
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1986 Jun 11; 106():2169-216. PubMed ID: 12041287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Women's Medical Center of Providence v. Roberts.
    U.S. District Court, D. Rhode Island.
    Fed Suppl; 1982 Jan 15; 530():1136-54. PubMed ID: 11648520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The woman's right to know: a model approach to the informed consent of abortion.
    Renfer SO, Shaheen R, Hegarty M.
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1991 Jan 15; 22(2):409-43. PubMed ID: 11651345
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.