These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

396 related items for PubMed ID: 12043640

  • 21. The invalidity of Canada's abortion law--section 251 of the Criminal Code.
    Picher PC.
    Crim Rep Can New Ser; 1974; 24():1-31. PubMed ID: 11663529
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Rape exceptions in post-Webster antiabortion legislation: a practical analysis.
    Strickland JA.
    Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1992; 26(1):163-97. PubMed ID: 11651646
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Schulte v. Douglas.
    U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska.
    Fed Suppl; 1981 Jul 30; 567():522-9. PubMed ID: 11648342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Missouri's unusual deterrent to abortion fails to get a hearing at the Supreme Court.
    Mintz M.
    Washington Post; 1979 Mar 06; ():A2. PubMed ID: 11648985
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention.
    MacDougal D, Nasser WP.
    Haw Bar J; 1975 Mar 06; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The Abortion and Sterilization Act 2 of 1975: a third opinion (part II).
    Bertrand AR.
    S Afr Tydskr Strafr Kriminol; 1978 Nov 06; 2(3):263-77. PubMed ID: 12091956
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Fetal research IV: the living fetus and the law--the state's role.
    Kindregan CP.
    Hum Life Rev; 1975 Nov 06; 1(4):133-44. PubMed ID: 11663566
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Abortion and political compromise.
    Wolfe C.
    First Things; 1992 Nov 06; 24():22-9. PubMed ID: 11656165
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Reform of German abortion law: first experiences.
    Eser A.
    Am J Comp Law; 1986 Nov 06; 34(2):369-83. PubMed ID: 11655825
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Benign sex discrimination revisited: constitutional and moral issues in banning sex-selection abortion.
    Schedler G.
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1988 Nov 06; 15(3):295-343. PubMed ID: 11659237
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies.
    Sangree S.
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1993 Nov 06; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Guam loses effort to limit abortion.
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr 17; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11647449
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Canadian abortion law.
    Ferri RM, Ferri T.
    Cathol Lawyer; 1986 Apr 17; 30(4):336-63. PubMed ID: 11659080
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Evolving conceptualizations of property: a proposal to de-commercialize the value of fetal tissue.
    Field NE.
    Yale Law J; 1989 Oct 17; 99(1):169-86. PubMed ID: 11659215
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Abortion and the law: questions for feminism.
    Menon N.
    Can J Women Law; 1993 Oct 17; 6(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 11659745
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Informed consent civil actions for post-abortion psychological trauma.
    Eller TR.
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1996 Oct 17; 71(4):639-70. PubMed ID: 11660407
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy.
    Long SL, Ravenscraft P.
    Akron Law Rev; 1976 Oct 17; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Development of Commonwealth abortion laws.
    Dickens BM, Cook RJ.
    Int Comp Law Q; 1979 Jul 17; 28(3):424-57. PubMed ID: 11655625
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Abortion: new law in Poland.
    Zielińska E.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1993 Feb 17; No. 85():23. PubMed ID: 11652205
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Constitutional law--substantive due process--abortion--reasonable statutory recordkeeping and reporting requirements upheld.
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1976 Feb 17; 1976(4):977-99. PubMed ID: 11664779
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.