These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
349 related items for PubMed ID: 12043685
41. Hope Medical Group for Women v. Edwards. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Fed Report; 1998 Sep 11; 63():418-29. PubMed ID: 11648424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Louisiana abortion law is delayed. Smothers R. N Y Times Web; 1991 Jun 20; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11647438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Development of Commonwealth abortion laws. Dickens BM, Cook RJ. Int Comp Law Q; 1979 Jul 20; 28(3):424-57. PubMed ID: 11655625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Womb for debate. Blinken AJ. New Repub; 1991 Jul 08; 205(2):12-3. PubMed ID: 11656088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention. MacDougal D, Nasser WP. Haw Bar J; 1975 Jul 08; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Law of 27 July 1992 on the protection of prenatal/nascent life, the promotion of a society suitable for children, aid in conflicts involving pregnancy, and the regulation of the termination of pregnancy. (Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, 4 August 1992, No. 37, pp. 1398-1404). Germany. Int Dig Health Legis; 1992 Jul 08; 43(4):. PubMed ID: 11659644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Wisconsin abortion clinics shut down, citing new law. Lewin T. N Y Times Web; 1998 May 15; ():A27. PubMed ID: 11647573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Harsh loophole in Utah abortion law. Lewin T. N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar 09; ():8. PubMed ID: 11647431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Abortion: state action. Womens Rights Law Report; 1977 Mar 09; 3(3-4):162-9. PubMed ID: 11663757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Abortion regulation: Louisiana's abortive attempt. Vance RP. LA Law Rev; 1974 Mar 09; 34(3):676-85. PubMed ID: 11663504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Morgentaler v. The Queen. 26 Mar 1975. Canada. Supreme Court. Dom Law Rep; 1975 Mar 09; 53():161-215. PubMed ID: 12038309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Regina v. Morgentaler. Canada. Ontario. Court of Appeal. Dom Law Rep; 1985 Oct 01; 22():641-724. PubMed ID: 12041080 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Abortion laws, religious beliefs and the first amendment. Skahn SL. Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1980 Oct 01; 14(3):487-526. PubMed ID: 11664174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Poland: the new "anti-abortion" law. Stojanowska W. Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1980 Oct 01; 33(2):471-5. PubMed ID: 11656452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Abortion: new law in Poland. Zielińska E. Bull Med Ethics; 1993 Feb 01; No. 85():23. PubMed ID: 11652205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Law of 30 Aug 1996 amending the law on family planning, protection of human fetuses, and the conditions under which pregnancy termination is permissable, and amending other laws. (Dziennik Ustaw Rzeczypospolitej, 4 Dec 1996, No. 139, Text No. 646, pp. 2885-2888). Poland. Int Dig Health Legis; 1997 Feb 01; 48(2):176-8. PubMed ID: 11656778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The abortion polemic: a restatement of pros and cons. Pérez de Agulló M. Rev Jurid Univ P R; 1973 Feb 01; 42(2):247-76. PubMed ID: 11663393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Pregnancy and abortion in adolescence: a comparative legal survey and proposals for reform. Lee LT, Paxman JM. Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973 Feb 01; 6(2):307-55. PubMed ID: 11664497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]