These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

144 related items for PubMed ID: 12058262

  • 1. A comparison of the effective dose from scanography with periapical radiography.
    Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Sanderink G, De Smet E, Nowak B, Van Dam J, Van Steenberghe D.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 12058262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
    Ngan DC, Kharbanda OP, Geenty JP, Darendeliler MA.
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography.
    Ekestubbe A, Thilander-Klang A, Lith A, Gröndahl HG.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 15313999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Organ radiation dose assessment for conventional spiral tomography: a human cadaver study.
    Bou Serhal C, van Steenberghe D, Bosmans H, Sanderink GC, Quirynen M, Jacobs R.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 11168275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
    Ohman A, Kull L, Andersson J, Flygare L.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography.
    Jadu F, Yaffe MJ, Lam EW.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 20587648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Efficacy of lead foil for reducing doses in the head and neck: a simulation study using digital intraoral systems.
    Nejaim Y, Silva AI, Brasil DM, Vasconcelos KF, Haiter Neto F, Boscolo FN.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015 Jul; 44(8):20150065. PubMed ID: 26084474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Radiation doses of collimated vs non-collimated cephalometric exposures.
    Gijbels F, Sanderink G, Wyatt J, Van Dam J, Nowak B, Jacobs R.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 12775668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation.
    Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1237-43. PubMed ID: 18762634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
    Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MA.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning.
    Okano T, Harata Y, Sugihara Y, Sakaino R, Tsuchida R, Iwai K, Seki K, Araki K.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 19176649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Organ doses and subjective image quality of indirect digital panoramic radiography.
    Gijbels F, Sanderink G, Bou Serhal C, Pauwels H, Jacobs R.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Nov; 30(6):308-13. PubMed ID: 11641728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
    Grünheid T, Kolbeck Schieck JR, Pliska BT, Ahmad M, Larson BE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
    Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.