These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations. Lindemuth JS, Hagge MS, Broome JS. Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP. Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. ER-YAG laser pretreatment effect on in vitro secondary caries formation around composite restorations. Ceballos L, Toledano M, Osorio R, García-Godoy F, Flaitz C, Hicks J. Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 11806480 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative evaluation of four restorative materials to support undermined occlusal enamel of permanent teeth. Prabhakar AR, Thejokrishna P, Kurthukoti AJ. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2006 Sep; 24(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 17065778 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Duncalf WV, Wilson NH. Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Interfacial micromorphology of three adhesive systems created in caries-affected dentin. Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 12967076 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]