These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

336 related items for PubMed ID: 12066649

  • 21. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Sadeghi M, Lynch CD, Shahamat N.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. A clinical evaluation of Class II composites placed using a decoupling technique.
    Wilson NH, Cowan AJ, Unterbrink G, Wilson MA, Crisp RJ.
    J Adhes Dent; 2000 Jul; 2(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 11317379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Two year clinical evaluation of a low-shrink resin composite material in UK general dental practices.
    Burke FJ, Crisp RJ, James A, Mackenzie L, Pal A, Sands P, Thompson O, Palin WM.
    Dent Mater; 2011 Jul; 27(7):622-30. PubMed ID: 21514654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
    Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Marginal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer-composite Class II restorations.
    Dietschi D, Bindi G, Krejci I, Davidson C.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Jun; 27(5):500-9. PubMed ID: 12216570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. A three-year clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents.
    Matis BA, Cochran MJ, Carlson TJ, Guba C, Eckert GJ.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Apr; 135(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 15127867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
    Pollington S, van Noort R.
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings.
    Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KL.
    J Dent; 1998 May; 26(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 9611936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Gianordoli Neto R, Santiago SL, Mendonça JS, Passos VF, Lauris JR, Navarro MF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May 01; 9(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 18473024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Three-year prospective clinical performance of a one-step self-etch adhesive and a nanofiller hybrid resin composite in Class V lesions.
    Preussker S, Pöschmann M, Kensche A, Natusch I, Koch R, Klimm W, Hannig C.
    Am J Dent; 2014 Apr 01; 27(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 25000664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice. Part 1, baseline data.
    Stewardson D, Thornley P, Bigg T, Bromage C, Browne A, Cottam D, Dalby D, Gilmour J, Horton J, Roberts E, Westoby L, Dietrich T, Burke T.
    Br Dent J; 2010 May 08; 208(9):E17; discussion 406-7. PubMed ID: 20448583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M.
    J Dent; 2007 Feb 08; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of the soft-start (pulse-delay) polymerization technique in Class I and II composite restorations.
    Chan DC, Browning WD, Frazier KB, Brackett MG.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Feb 08; 33(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 18505216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Mönting JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb 08; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. An eighteen-month clinical evaluation of posterior restorations with fluoride releasing adhesive and composite systems.
    Akimoto N, Ohmori K, Hanabusa M, Momoi Y.
    Dent Mater J; 2011 Feb 08; 30(3):411-8. PubMed ID: 21597208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
    Aggarwal V, Logani A, Jain V, Shah N.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Feb 08; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results.
    Lundin SA, Rasmusson CG.
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct 08; 35(9):758-62. PubMed ID: 15471000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7-year report.
    Türkün LS, Aktener BO, Ateş M.
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jun 08; 34(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 12859086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW.
    J Dent; 2000 Jul 08; 28(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10785294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.
    Shi L, Wang X, Zhao Q, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Ren Y, Chen Z.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Jul 08; 35(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20166406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.