These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

482 related items for PubMed ID: 12066659

  • 1. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays.
    Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P.
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12066659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A 3-year study of inlays milled from machinable ceramic blocks representing 2 different inlay systems.
    Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P.
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Dec; 30(12):829-36. PubMed ID: 10765860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS, Neto RG, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Navarro MF, de Carvalho RM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May 01; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
    Otto T, Schneider D.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008 May 01; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite.
    Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004 May 01; 17(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 15119879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Petschelt A, Krämer N.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Aug 01; 25(8):960-8. PubMed ID: 19344946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays.
    Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Aug 01; 25(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 11203859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B, Mlotkowski A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb 01; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I, Ergun G, Uctasli S, Lassila LV.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May 01; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up.
    Santos MJ, Mondelli RF, Navarro MF, Francischone CE, Rubo JH, Santos GC.
    Oper Dent; 2013 May 01; 38(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 22856680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.