These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Automatic refraction and the private ophthalmologist: Dioptron II compared with subjective examination. Mailer CM. Can J Ophthalmol; 1978 Oct; 13(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 743607 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Automatic refractometry, reliability of the determination of type and degree of refraction anomalies]. Kovacić Z, Ivanisević M, Plestina-Borjan I, Capkun V. Lijec Vjesn; 1998 Jun; 120(6):162-4. PubMed ID: 9819515 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A clinical study of the autorefractor, an antomatic refracting device. Dyson C. Can J Ophthalmol; 1977 Jan; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 849538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative data on the study of visual acuity by the subjective and objective methods and with the aid of I.A. Viazovskiĭ's nystagmographic apparatus]. Pinchuk GD. Oftalmol Zh; 1977 Dec; 32(6):431-3. PubMed ID: 593640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Aphakic ultrasonographic refraction in adults. Comparison with retinoscopy and subjective refraction. Belkin M, Horev G. Metab Pediatr Syst Ophthalmol; 1982 Dec; 6(3-4):269-72. PubMed ID: 7185018 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in children. Chat SW, Edwards MH. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Mar; 21(2):87-100. PubMed ID: 11261351 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Refractive and visual outcome of hyperopic cataract cases operated on before and after implementation of the Holladay II formula. Fenzl RE, Gills JP, Cherchio M. Ophthalmology; 1998 Sep; 105(9):1759-64. PubMed ID: 9754188 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]