These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

449 related items for PubMed ID: 12074452

  • 1. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits.
    London RM, Roberts FA, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O'Neal RB.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible.
    Novaes AB, Souza SL, de Oliveira PT, Souza AM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 12074453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
    Faeda RS, Tavares HS, Sartori R, Guastaldi AC, Marcantonio E.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Guided bone regeneration around titanium plasma-sprayed, acid-etched, and hydroxyapatite-coated implants in the canine model.
    Conner KA, Sabatini R, Mealey BL, Takacs VJ, Mills MP, Cochran DL.
    J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):658-68. PubMed ID: 12816298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the osseointegration of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae.
    Jung YC, Han CH, Lee IS, Kim HE.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001 May; 16(6):809-18. PubMed ID: 11769831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Early bone healing around 2 different experimental, HA grit-blasted, and dual acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A pilot study in rabbits.
    Gobbato L, Arguello E, Martin IS, Hawley CE, Griffin TJ.
    Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 23149502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
    Lin A, Wang CJ, Kelly J, Gubbi P, Nishimura I.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Dec; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
    Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Piattelli A, Scarano A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000 Dec; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Histologic and histomorphometric comparison of immediately placed hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a pilot study in dogs.
    Karabuda C, Sandalli P, Yalcin S, Steflik DE, Parr GR.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999 Dec; 14(4):510-5. PubMed ID: 10453665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Histomorphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in rabbit cortical bone using longitudinal and transverse histologic sections.
    Rebollal J, Soares Gde A, Vidigal GM.
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 20386217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Sandblasted and acid-etched dental implants: a histologic study in rats.
    Marinho VC, Celletti R, Bracchetti G, Petrone G, Minkin C, Piattelli A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003 Apr; 18(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 12608672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of titanium plasma-sprayed and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite implants in vivo.
    Ong JL, Carnes DL, Bessho K.
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(19):4601-6. PubMed ID: 15120505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Histomorphometric evaluation of six dental implant surfaces after early loading in augmented human sinuses.
    Todisco M, Trisi P.
    J Oral Implantol; 2006 Aug; 32(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 17009559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Rate of pull-out strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: a comparative study in rabbits.
    Baker D, London RM, O'Neal R.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999 Aug; 14(5):722-8. PubMed ID: 10531744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Healing response of cortical and cancellous bone around titanium implants.
    Lee JE, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK, Han CH, Lee SJ.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Aug; 24(4):655-62. PubMed ID: 19885405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effect of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals on early bone formation surrounding dental implants.
    Svanborg LM, Hoffman M, Andersson M, Currie F, Kjellin P, Wennerberg A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 21111575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
    He F, Yang G, Wang X, Zhao S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Mar; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.