These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


143 related items for PubMed ID: 12075297

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Binocular fixation pattern and visual acuity in children with strabismic amblyopia.
    Laws D, Noonan CP, Ward A, Chandna A.
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2000; 37(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 10714692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Association between fixation preference testing and strabismic pseudoamblyopia.
    Hakim OM.
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2007; 44(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 17542440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Fixation preference test: reliability for the detection of amblyopia in patients with strabismus and interexaminer agreement.
    Erkan Turan K, Taylan Sekeroglu H, Karahan S, Sanac AS.
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 37(6):1305-1310. PubMed ID: 27933481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The accuracy of binocular fixation preference for the diagnosis of strabismic amblyopia.
    Procianoy L, Procianoy E.
    J AAPOS; 2010 Jun; 14(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 20418133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fixation preference and visual acuity testing in a population-based cohort of preschool children with amblyopia risk factors.
    Cotter SA, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Song E, Lin J, Borchert M, Azen SP, Varma R, Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 18962921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. False amblyopia prediction in strabismic patients by fixation preference testing correlates with contralateral ocular dominance.
    AlHarkan DH, Khan AO.
    J AAPOS; 2014 Oct; 18(5):453-6. PubMed ID: 25266829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Long-term changes in visual acuity and refractive error in amblyopes.
    Rutstein RP, Corliss DA.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jul; 81(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 15252350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of central, steady, maintained fixation grading for predicting inter-eye visual acuity difference to diagnose and treat amblyopia in strabismic patients.
    Kothari M, Bhaskare A, Mete D, Toshniwal S, Doshi P, Kaul S.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 57(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 19574695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Lack of concordance between fixation preference and HOTV optotype visual acuity in preschool children: the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study.
    Friedman DS, Katz J, Repka MX, Giordano L, Ibironke J, Hawse P, Tielsch JM.
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Oct; 115(10):1796-9. PubMed ID: 18538405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Saccadic latency in amblyopia.
    McKee SP, Levi DM, Schor CM, Movshon JA.
    J Vis; 2016 Oct; 16(5):3. PubMed ID: 26943348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of the HOTV and Lea symbols visual acuity tests in patients with amblyopia.
    Ruttum MS, Dahlgren M.
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2006 Oct; 43(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 16761636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Estimation of strabismic amblyopia by small-sized concentric gratings in preverbal children.
    Tejedor J, Rodríguez JM.
    Eye (Lond); 2008 Sep; 22(9):1110-6. PubMed ID: 17479119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparative efficacy of penalization methods in moderate to mild amblyopia.
    Tejedor J, Ogallar C.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 145(3):562-9. PubMed ID: 18207121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Transient improvements in fixational stability in strabismic amblyopes following bifoveal fixation and reduced interocular suppression.
    Raveendran RN, Babu RJ, Hess RF, Bobier WR.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Mar; 34(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 24495165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Blue filter amblyopia treatment protocol for strabismic amblyopia: a prospective comparative study of 50 cases.
    Metzler U, Ham O, Flores V, Claramunt M, Sepulveda C, Casanova D.
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 1998 Mar; 13(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 9852438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of stimulus configuration on crowding in strabismic amblyopia.
    Norgett Y, Siderov J.
    J Vis; 2017 Nov 01; 17(13):5. PubMed ID: 29114805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients.
    Engin O, Despriet DD, van der Meulen-Schot HM, Romers A, Slot X, Sang MT, Fronius M, Kelderman H, Simonsz HJ.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec 01; 252(12):2013-20. PubMed ID: 25228066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Distance versus near visual acuity in amblyopia.
    Christoff A, Repka MX, Kaminski BM, Holmes JM, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group.
    J AAPOS; 2011 Aug 01; 15(4):342-4. PubMed ID: 21907115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Dynamics of Interocular Suppression in Amblyopic Children during Electronically Monitored Occlusion Therapy: First Insight.
    Kehrein S, Kohnen T, Fronius M.
    Strabismus; 2016 Jun 01; 24(2):51-62. PubMed ID: 27220458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.