These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

404 related items for PubMed ID: 12076896

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Lesion and patient characteristics associated with malignancy after a probably benign finding on community practice mammography.
    Lehman CD, Rutter CM, Eby PR, White E, Buist DS, Taplin SH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):511-5. PubMed ID: 18212240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Recommendation for short-interval follow-up examinations after a probably benign assessment: is clinical practice consistent with BI-RADS guidance?
    Bowles EJ, Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Elmore JG.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):1152-9. PubMed ID: 20308525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease.
    Geller BM, Barlow WE, Ballard-Barbash R, Ernster VL, Yankaskas BC, Sickles EA, Carney PA, Dignan MB, Rosenberg RD, Urban N, Zheng Y, Taplin SH.
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 11818625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of Changes in BI-RADS Density Assessment Guidelines (Fourth Versus Fifth Edition) on Breast Density Assessment: Intra- and Interreader Agreements and Density Distribution.
    Irshad A, Leddy R, Ackerman S, Cluver A, Pavic D, Abid A, Lewis MC.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Dec; 207(6):1366-1371. PubMed ID: 27656766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
    Buchbinder SS, Leichter IS, Lederman RB, Novak B, Bamberger PN, Sklair-Levy M, Yarmish G, Fields SI.
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms.
    Redondo A, Comas M, Macià F, Ferrer F, Murta-Nascimento C, Maristany MT, Molins E, Sala M, Castells X.
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22993385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions.
    Varas X, Leborgne JH, Leborgne F, Mezzera J, Jaumandreu S, Leborgne F.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Sep; 179(3):691-5. PubMed ID: 12185047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Changing Rates of BI-RADS Final Assessment over Time.
    Raghu M, Durand MA, Andrejeva L, Goehler A, Michalski MH, Geisel JL, Hooley RJ, Horvath LJ, Butler R, Forman HP, Philpotts LE.
    Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 27139264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome].
    Lorenzen J, Wedel AK, Lisboa BW, Löning T, Adam G.
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.