These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

466 related items for PubMed ID: 12083080

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. o'Connor v. Donaldson: a right to liberty for the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Muller MJ.
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1975; 3(2):550-62. PubMed ID: 11664550
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Postadmission due process for mentally ill and mentally retarded children after Parham v. J.R. and Secretary of Public Welfare v. Institutionalized Juveniles.
    Joseph BC.
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1979; 29(1):129-57. PubMed ID: 11665106
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill.
    Fields JD.
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Due process--involuntary civil confinement: a right to rehabilitative treatment?
    Vermillion LJ.
    ISL Law Rev; 1976; 1(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 11664678
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment?
    Bliss TP.
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 11661275
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
    Ferleger D, Scott PM.
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Wyatt v. Stickney and the right of civilly committed mental patients to adequate treatment.
    Harv Law Rev; 1973 May; 86(7):1282-306. PubMed ID: 11664219
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
    Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976 May; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Constitutional law--confinement of nondangerous mentally ill capable of surviving safely in freedom held to violate patient's right to "liberty".
    Hancock GC.
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1976 May; 10(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 11664793
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Forced drug medication of involuntarily committed mental patients.
    Blais NR.
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1975 May; 20(1):100-19. PubMed ID: 11664646
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Constitutional law--mental health--a patient involuntarily civilly committed to a state mental hospital has a constitutional right to treatment.
    North BS.
    Villanova Law Rev; 1974 Nov; 20(1):214-25. PubMed ID: 11664581
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Constitutional law--due process--right to treatment for nondangerous involuntarily civilly committed persons.
    Currie EJ.
    Miss Law J; 1975 Nov; 46(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 11664483
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.