These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

688 related items for PubMed ID: 12086356

  • 1. Interest of a prescreening questionnaire to reduce the cost of bone densitometry.
    Ben Sedrine W, Broers P, Devogelaer JP, Depresseux G, Kaufman JM, Goemaere S, Reginster JY.
    Osteoporos Int; 2002 May; 13(5):434-42. PubMed ID: 12086356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Screening for osteoporosis using easily obtainable biometrical data: diagnostic accuracy of measured, self-reported and recalled BMI, and related costs of bone mineral density measurements.
    van der Voort DJ, Brandon S, Dinant GJ, van Wersch JW.
    Osteoporos Int; 2000 May; 11(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 10824239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of accuracy and cost effectiveness of clinical criteria and BUA for referral for BMD assessment by DXA in osteoporotic and osteopenic perimenopausal subjects.
    Langton CM, Langton DK, Beardsworth SA.
    Technol Health Care; 1999 May; 7(5):319-30. PubMed ID: 10543417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bone mineral density referral for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using quantitative ultrasound as a prescreening tool in postmenopausal women from the general population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Marín F, López-Bastida J, Díez-Pérez A, Sacristán JA, ECOSAP DXA Substudy Group Investigators.
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Mar; 74(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 14708042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Development and validation of the osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) tool to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density.
    Salaffi F, Silveri F, Stancati A, Grassi W.
    Clin Rheumatol; 2005 Jun; 24(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 15549501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat.
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006 Jun; 6(20):1-180. PubMed ID: 23074491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of the simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation (SCORE) in a sample of white women from Belgium.
    Ben Sedrine W, Devogelaer JP, Kaufman JM, Goemaere S, Depresseux G, Zegels B, Deroisy R, Reginster JY.
    Bone; 2001 Oct; 29(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 11595621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Maximising the cost effectiveness of BMD referral for DXA using ultrasound as a selective population pre-screen.
    Langton CM, Ballard PA, Langton DK, Purdie DW.
    Technol Health Care; 1997 Jul; 5(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 9263372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Radiographic absorptiometry as a screening tool in male osteoporosis: results from the Odense Androgen Study.
    Hansen SJ, Nielsen MM, Ryg J, Wraae K, Andersen M, Brixen K.
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 19488892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cost effectiveness analysis of using quantitative ultrasound as a selective pre-screen for bone densitometry.
    Sim MF, Stone MD, Phillips CJ, Cheung WY, Johansen A, Vasishta S, Pettit RJ, Evans WD.
    Technol Health Care; 2005 Jul; 13(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 15912005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
    de Klerk G, van der Velde D, van der Palen J, van Bergeijk L, Hegeman JH.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cost effectiveness analysis of BMD referral for DXA using ultrasound as a selective pre-screen in a group of women with low trauma Colles' fractures.
    Sim MF, Stone M, Johansen A, Evans W.
    Technol Health Care; 2000 Feb; 8(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 11204173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. An investigation of the diagnostic value of bilateral femoral neck bone mineral density measurements.
    Petley GW, Taylor PA, Murrills AJ, Dennison E, Pearson G, Cooper C.
    Osteoporos Int; 2000 Feb; 11(8):675-9. PubMed ID: 11095170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The accuracy of bone mineral density at distal radius on non-forearm osteoporosis identification.
    Trivitayaratana W, Trivitayaratana P.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Apr; 84(4):566-71. PubMed ID: 11460970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment of cancellous bone quality in femoral neck of healthy, osteopenic and osteoporotic subjects at 3T: Preliminary experience.
    Manenti G, Capuani S, Fanucci E, Assako EP, Masala S, Sorge R, Iundusi R, Tarantino U, Simonetti G.
    Bone; 2013 Jul; 55(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 23507402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Use of a Swedish T-score reference population for women causes a two-fold increase in the amount of postmenopausal Swedish patients that fulfill the WHO criteria for osteoporosis.
    Ribom EL, Ljunggren O, Mallmin H.
    J Clin Densitom; 2008 Jul; 11(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 18280191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Quantitative ultrasound or clinical risk factors--which best identifies women at risk of osteoporosis?
    Stewart A, Reid DM.
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 73(866):165-71. PubMed ID: 10884730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.