These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

239 related items for PubMed ID: 12105711

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Workflow improvement and efficiency gain with near total digitalization of a radiology department].
    Langen HL, Bielmeier J, Wittenberg G, Selbach R, Feustel H.
    Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1309-16. PubMed ID: 14556098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR.
    Neitzel U.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Oct; 114(1-3):32-8. PubMed ID: 15933078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Impact of digital radiography on clinical workflow.
    May GA, Deer DD, Dackiewicz D.
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):76-8. PubMed ID: 10847368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP, Lehmann KJ, Georgi M.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT, Chan HP, Cascade PN, Chang CL, Chee PW, Mathews JF.
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. CR/DR systems: what each technology offers today; what is expected for the future.
    Gallet J, Titus H.
    Radiol Manage; 2005 Feb; 27(6):30-6. PubMed ID: 16475561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Integrating digital systems: commitment and collaboration.
    Himes JA, Rosenfeld K.
    Radiol Manage; 2004 Feb; 26(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 15259684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE, Baker JA, Chotas HG, Delong DM, Ravin CE.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
    Freedman M.
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times.
    Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Solari M, Barke L, Reddy D, Wolfman J, Segal L, DeLeon P, Benjamin S, Willis L.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 16794152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Film-screen digital radiography.
    Schwenker RP, Eger H.
    Radiography; 1985 Jul; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.