These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

787 related items for PubMed ID: 12108231

  • 1. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K, Smeets P, Bonnarens K, De Hauwere A, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.
    Geijer H, Beckman K, Jonsson B, Andersson T, Persliden J.
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 11161153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study.
    Geijer H, Beckman KW, Andersson T, Persliden J.
    Eur Radiol; 2001 Feb; 11(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 11511892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
    Busch HP, Busch S, Decker C, Schilz C.
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ.
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
    Ludwig K, Ahlers K, Wormanns D, Freund M, Bernhardt TM, Diederich S, Heindel W.
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography].
    Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 11142129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
    Bacher K, Smeets P, Vereecken L, De Hauwere A, Duyck P, De Man R, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Variation in X-ray dose quantity using an amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector -- a study on the dose reduction rate up to the limit of diagnostical utilization].
    Lehnert T, Wohlers J, Streng W, Manegold K, Wetter A, Jacobi V, Mack MG, Vogl TJ.
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 16508834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.
    Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser J, Völk M, Fründ R, Seitz J, Manke C, Albrich H, Feuerbach S.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9648757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography at different exposure doses versus mammography film: possibility of radiation dose reduction in detecting rheumatologic bone defects.
    Zähringer M, Reineck S, Perniok A, Krüger K, Andermahr J, Rubbert A, Winnekendonk G.
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 18300139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
    Ganten M, Radeleff B, Kampschulte A, Daniels MD, Kauffmann GW, Hansmann J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
    Hamer OW, Sirlin CB, Strotzer M, Borisch I, Zorger N, Feuerbach S, Völk M.
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.
    Rapp-Bernhardt U, Bernhardt TM, Lenzen H, Esseling R, Roehl FW, Schiborr M, Theobald-Hormann I, Heindel W.
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 16170012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system.
    Spahn M, Strotzer M, Völk M, Böhm S, Geiger B, Hahm G, Feuerbach S.
    Invest Radiol; 2000 Apr; 35(4):260-6. PubMed ID: 10764095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 40.