These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

364 related items for PubMed ID: 12115888

  • 1. Expert system support using a Bayesian belief network for the classification of endometrial hyperplasia.
    Morrison ML, McCluggage WG, Price GJ, Diamond J, Sheeran MR, Mulholland KM, Walsh MY, Montironi R, Bartels PH, Thompson D, Hamilton PW.
    J Pathol; 2002 Jul; 197(3):403-14. PubMed ID: 12115888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
    Zaino RJ, Kauderer J, Trimble CL, Silverberg SG, Curtin JP, Lim PC, Gallup DG.
    Cancer; 2006 Feb 15; 106(4):804-11. PubMed ID: 16400640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Computerized diagnostic decision support system for the classification of preinvasive cervical squamous lesions.
    Price GJ, McCluggage WG, Morrison M ML, McClean G, Venkatraman L, Diamond J, Bharucha H, Montironi R, Bartels PH, Thompson D, Hamilton PW.
    Hum Pathol; 2003 Nov 15; 34(11):1193-203. PubMed ID: 14652822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Determining the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia subgroups and well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma in endometrial curettage specimens.
    Izadi-Mood N, Khaniki M, Irvanloo G, Ahmadi SA, Hayeri H, Meysamie A.
    Arch Iran Med; 2009 Jul 15; 12(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 19566355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A computer-based training system for breast fine needle aspiration cytology.
    Diamond J, Anderson NH, Thompson D, Bartels PH, Hamilton PW.
    J Pathol; 2002 Jan 15; 196(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 11748650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A multicentric European study testing the reproducibility of the WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia with a proposal of a simplified working classification for biopsy and curettage specimens.
    Bergeron C, Nogales FF, Masseroli M, Abeler V, Duvillard P, Müller-Holzner E, Pickartz H, Wells M.
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1999 Sep 15; 23(9):1102-8. PubMed ID: 10478671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Reproducibility of current classifications of endometrial endometrioid glandular proliferations: further evidence supporting a simplified classification.
    Ordi J, Bergeron C, Hardisson D, McCluggage WG, Hollema H, Felix A, Soslow RA, Oliva E, Tavassoli FA, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Wells M, Nogales FF.
    Histopathology; 2014 Jan 15; 64(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 24111732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of the reproducibility of the WHO classifications of 1975 and 1994 of endometrial hyperplasia.
    Skov BG, Broholm H, Engel U, Franzmann MB, Nielsen AL, Lauritzen AF, Skov T.
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1997 Jan 15; 16(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 8986530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Computer-aided application of quantitative microscopy in diagnostic pathology.
    Baak JP, Kurver PH, Boon ME.
    Pathol Annu; 1982 Jan 15; 17 Pt 2():287-306. PubMed ID: 7182754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Endometrial hyperplasias: histology, classification, prognostic significance and therapy].
    Horn LC, Bilek K, Schnurrbusch U.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997 Jan 15; 119(6):251-9. PubMed ID: 9312959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of endometrial neoplasia.
    Winkler B, Alvarez S, Richart RM, Crum CP.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Aug 15; 64(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 6377150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). Performance of Bayesian belief network for diagnosis and grading.
    Montironi R, Bartels PH, Thompson D, Scarpelli M, Hamilton PW.
    J Pathol; 1995 Oct 15; 177(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 7490682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Study on the morphology and reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial lesions utilizing liquid-based cytology.
    Papaefthimiou M, Symiakaki H, Mentzelopoulou P, Tsiveleka A, Kyroudes A, Voulgaris Z, Tzonou A, Karakitsos P.
    Cancer; 2005 Apr 25; 105(2):56-64. PubMed ID: 15751019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Interobserver reproducibility in the pathologic diagnosis of borderline ductal proliferative breast diseases].
    Wei B, Bu H, Zhu CR, Guo LX, Chen HJ, Zhao C, Zhang P, Chen DY, Tang Y, Jiang Y.
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Nov 25; 35(6):849-53. PubMed ID: 15573772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Why oral histopathology suffers inter-observer variability on grading oral epithelial dysplasia: an attempt to understand the sources of variation.
    Kujan O, Khattab A, Oliver RJ, Roberts SA, Thakker N, Sloan P.
    Oral Oncol; 2007 Mar 25; 43(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 16931119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and well-differentiated carcinoma.
    Kendall BS, Ronnett BM, Isacson C, Cho KR, Hedrick L, Diener-West M, Kurman RJ.
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1998 Aug 25; 22(8):1012-9. PubMed ID: 9706982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Difficulties and mistakes in the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia].
    Kxmel'nitskaia NM, Neĭshtadt EL, Khalimdzhanov ZK.
    Arkh Patol; 2006 Aug 25; 68(6):39-42. PubMed ID: 17290894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Search for problem areas in endometrial biopsies to achieve quality assurance.
    Usubütün A, Ertoy D, Ozkaya O, Altinok G, Kücukali T.
    Pathol Res Pract; 2000 Aug 25; 196(9):625-6. PubMed ID: 10997737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Reproducibility of biopsy diagnoses of endometrial hyperplasia: evidence supporting a simplified classification.
    Sherman ME, Ronnett BM, Ioffe OB, Richesson DA, Rush BB, Glass AG, Chatterjee N, Duggan MA, Lacey JV.
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2008 Jul 25; 27(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 18580308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The comparison of the agreement in determining the histological grade of uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, using the three-grade FIGO classification and the two-grade system.
    Demczuk S, Wierzchowski W, Szczepański W, Dyduch G, Czopek J, Stachura J.
    Pol J Pathol; 2003 Jul 25; 54(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 14703284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.