These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparison of the effect of positive and negative oral contrast agents on (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan. Sun XG, Huang G, Liu JJ, Wan LR. Hell J Nucl Med; 2009; 12(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 19675862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of different contrast medium concentrations and injection protocols on quantitative and clinical assessment of FDG-PET/CT in lung cancer. Verburg FA, Kuhl CK, Pietsch H, Palmowski M, Mottaghy FM, Behrendt FF. Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e617-22. PubMed ID: 23880426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of iterative reconstruction, attenuation correction, and image fusion in the interpretation of FDG PET images with an integrated dual-head coincidence camera and X-ray-based attenuation maps. Delbeke D, Martin WH, Patton JA, Sandler MP. Radiology; 2001 Jan; 218(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 11152796 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonionic intravenous contrast agent does not cause clinically significant artifacts to 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with lung cancer. An YS, Sheen SS, Oh YJ, Hwang SC, Yoon JK. Ann Nucl Med; 2007 Dec 01; 21(10):585-92. PubMed ID: 18092135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]