These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

559 related items for PubMed ID: 12136361

  • 1. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Sundgren PC, Sundén P, Lindgren A, Lanke J, Holtås S, Larsson EM.
    Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
    Timaran CH, Rosero EB, Valentine RJ, Modrall JG, Smith S, Clagett GP.
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital.
    Korteweg MA, Kerkhoff H, Bakker J, Elgersma OE.
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    U-King-Im JM, Graves MJ, Cross JJ, Higgins NJ, Wat J, Trivedi RA, Tang T, Howarth SP, Kirkpatrick PJ, Antoun NM, Gillard JH.
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Nederkoorn PJ, Elgersma OE, Mali WP, Eikelboom BC, Kappelle LJ, van der Graaf Y.
    J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography--preliminary study.
    Remonda L, Heid O, Schroth G.
    Radiology; 1998 Oct; 209(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 9769818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Noninvasive detection of steno-occlusive disease of the supra-aortic arteries with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a prospective, intra-individual comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography.
    Willinek WA, von Falkenhausen M, Born M, Gieseke J, Höller T, Klockgether T, Textor HJ, Schild HH, Urbach H.
    Stroke; 2005 Jan; 36(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15569881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the carotid artery at 1.0 Tesla compared to i.a. DSA: is the method suitable for the diagnosis of carotid stenosis?].
    Oberholzer K, Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Pitton M, Requardt M, Thelen M.
    Rofo; 2001 Apr; 173(4):350-5. PubMed ID: 11367845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?
    Vanninen RL, Manninen HI, Partanen PK, Tulla H, Vainio PA.
    Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Alvarez-Linera J, Benito-León J, Escribano J, Campollo J, Gesto R.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis.
    D'Onofrio M, Mansueto G, Faccioli N, Guarise A, Tamellini P, Bogina G, Pozzi Mucelli R.
    Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 16623309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Assessment of CE-MRA for the rapid detection of supra-aortic vascular disease.
    Wright VL, Olan W, Dick B, Yu H, Alberts-Grill N, Latour LL, Baird AE.
    Neurology; 2005 Jul 12; 65(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16009882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in the study of the carotid stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
    Scarabino T, Carriero A, Giannatempo GM, Marano R, De Matthaeis P, Bonomo L, Salvolini U.
    J Neuroradiol; 1999 Jun 12; 26(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 10444932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Magnetic resonance angiography with contrast media in the study of carotid arteries].
    Catalano C, Laghi A, Pediconi F, Fraioli F, Napoli A, Passariello R.
    Radiol Med; 2001 Jun 12; 101(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 11360754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Actual role of unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography (mra tof 3d) in the study of stenosis and occlusion of extracranial carotid artery.
    Scarabino T, Fossaceca R, Carra L, Florio F, Marano G, Carriero A.
    Radiol Med; 2003 Jun 12; 106(5-6):497-503. PubMed ID: 14735016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Measuring carotid stenosis on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: diagnostic performance and reproducibility of 3 different methods.
    U-King-Im JM, Trivedi RA, Cross JJ, Higgins NJ, Hollingworth W, Graves M, Joubert I, Kirkpatrick PJ, Antoun NM, Gillard JH.
    Stroke; 2004 Sep 12; 35(9):2083-8. PubMed ID: 15243149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
    Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, Duyme M, Sahel M, Zouaoui A, Marsault C.
    Radiology; 2001 Jul 12; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Elgersma OE, Wüst AF, Buijs PC, van Der Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, Mali WP.
    Radiology; 2000 Aug 12; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Contrast-enhanced MRA of the carotid arteries using 0.5 Tesla: comparison with selective digital angiography].
    Barbier C, Lefèvre F, Bui P, Denny P, Aiouaz C, Becker S.
    J Radiol; 2001 Mar 12; 82(3 Pt 1):245-9. PubMed ID: 11287855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Stenosis-occlusion of the carotid bifurcation. Angiography with MR and contrast media versus digital angiography].
    Scarabino T, Carriero A, Balzano S, Sciannelli V, Bonomo L, Salvolini U.
    Radiol Med; 1998 Mar 12; 95(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9638160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.