These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

518 related items for PubMed ID: 12146589

  • 1. Re-treatment decisions for failed posterior fillings by Finnish general practitioners.
    Heinikainen M, Vehkalahti M, Murtomaa H.
    Community Dent Health; 2002 Jun; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 12146589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Retreatment in endodontics: treatment decisions by general practitioners and dental teachers in Finland.
    Heinikainen M, Vehkalahti M, Murtomaa H.
    Int Dent J; 2002 Jun; 52(3):119-24. PubMed ID: 12090260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations.
    Palotie U, Vehkalahti MM.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009 Jun; 67(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 19039686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Selection of restorative materials in dental treatment of children and adults in public and private dental care in Finland.
    Widström E, Forss H.
    Swed Dent J; 1994 Jun; 18(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 8052946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Problems associated with restorative materials--dentists' views in Finland and Sweden.
    Widström E, Sundberg H.
    Swed Dent J; 1991 Jun; 15(4):153-60. PubMed ID: 1957249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The role of volume of multi-surface restorations in posterior teeth: Treatment options.
    Janus C, Sbeih I, Best AM.
    Gen Dent; 2011 Jun; 59(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 22313920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Survey of general dentists regarding posterior restorations, selection criteria, and associated clinical problems.
    Haj-Ali R, Walker MP, Williams K.
    Gen Dent; 2005 Jun; 53(5):369-75; quiz 376, 367-8. PubMed ID: 16252541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice.
    Whitworth JM, Myers PM, Smith J, Walls AW, McCabe JF.
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Safety of dental restorative materials: a survey of dentists' attitudes.
    Widström E, Forss H.
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1991 Jun; 87(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 1749781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Dentists' molar restoration choices and longevity: a web-based survey.
    Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Rashid RG.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 15116038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Dental practitioners' experiences on the usefulness of restorative materials in Finland 1992-1996.
    Widström E, Forss H.
    Br Dent J; 1998 Nov 28; 185(10):540-2. PubMed ID: 9874887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S, Tveit AB, Gaarden T, Sandvik L, Espelid I.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009 Nov 28; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings.
    Pink FE, Minden NJ, Simmonds S.
    Oper Dent; 1994 Nov 28; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Long-term survivals of 'direct-wax' cast gold onlays: a retrospective study in a general dental practice.
    Bandlish LK, Mariatos G.
    Br Dent J; 2009 Aug 08; 207(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 19662053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Re-restoration decisions].
    Verdonschot EH, Plasschaert AJ, de Vries Robbé PF.
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1998 Mar 08; 105(3):84-6. PubMed ID: 11928406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners.
    Lynch CD, McConnell RJ.
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jun 08; 40(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 17501755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Attitudes of dentists and interns in Riyadh to the use of dental amalgam.
    Alkhudhairy F.
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Nov 17; 9(1):488. PubMed ID: 27855718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S, Bardwell DN.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006 Nov 17; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Influence of patient characteristics on Finnish dentists' decision-making in implant therapy.
    Heinikainen M, Vehkalahti M, Murtomaa H.
    Implant Dent; 2002 Nov 17; 11(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 12271570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Informed consent: direct posterior composite versus amalgam.
    Dlugokinski M, Browning WD.
    J Am Coll Dent; 2001 Nov 17; 68(2):31-40. PubMed ID: 11764638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.