These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival with aortic valve replacement: assessment to 15 years. Jamieson WR, Ye J, Higgins J, Cheung A, Fradet GJ, Skarsgard P, Germann E, Chan F, Lichtenstein SV. Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Jan; 89(1):51-8; discussion 59. PubMed ID: 20103205 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients. McClure RS, Narayanasamy N, Wiegerinck E, Lipsitz S, Maloney A, Byrne JG, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Cohn LH. Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1410-6. PubMed ID: 20417753 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Re-do aortic valve replacement: does a previous homograft influence the operative outcome? Kumar P, Athanasiou T, Ali A, Nair S, Oz BS, DeSouza A, Moat N, Shore DF, Pepper JR. J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):904-12; discussion 912-3. PubMed ID: 15597580 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement: predictors of adverse outcome. Kuwaki K, Tsukamoto M, Komatsu K, Morishita K, Sakata J, Abe T. J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 12701788 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience. Goldsmith I, Lip GY, Mukundan S, Rosin MD. J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population. Bottio T, Rizzoli G, Caprili L, Testolin L, Thiene G, Gerosa G. J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion. Legarra JJ, Llorens R, Catalan M, Segura I, Trenor AM, de Buruaga JS, Rabago G, Sarralde A. J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis. David TE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Feindel CM, Cohen G. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Twelve-year experience with the 19 mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve. Nakajima H, Aupart MR, Neville PH, Sirinelli AL, Meurisse YA, Marchand MA. J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):534-9. PubMed ID: 9793853 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The stentless freestyle bioprosthesis: impact of age over 80 years on quality of life, perioperative, and mid-term outcome. Ennker J, Dalladaku F, Rosendahl U, Ennker IC, Mauser M, Florath I. J Card Surg; 2006 Sep; 21(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16846417 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement. Jamieson WR, David TE, Feindel CM, Miyagishima RT, Germann E. J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May; 11(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 12056738 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless valve: five-year follow up. Nyawo B, Graham R, Hunter S. J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Jan; 16(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17315382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]