These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

594 related items for PubMed ID: 12170856

  • 21. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
    Cune M, van Kampen F, van der Bilt A, Bosman F.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Mandibular overdentures: comparative evaluation of prosthodontic maintenance of three different implant systems during the first year of service.
    Watson GK, Payne AG, Purton DG, Thomson WM.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 12066489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Sex differences in denture satisfaction.
    Pan S, Awad M, Thomason JM, Dufresne E, Kobayashi T, Kimoto S, Wollin SD, Feine JS.
    J Dent; 2008 May; 36(5):301-8. PubMed ID: 18394770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
    Alfadda SA, Attard NJ, David LA.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009 May; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The effect of different attachment systems with implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG.
    Uçankale M, Akoğlu B, Ozkan Y, Ozkan YK.
    Gerodontology; 2012 Mar; 29(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 20604812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The cost of dental implants as compared to that of conventional strategies.
    van der Wijk P, Bouma J, van Waas MA, van Oort RP, Rutten FF.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998 Mar; 13(4):546-53. PubMed ID: 9714962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol.
    Walton JN.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Mar; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Can general dentists produce successful implant overdentures with minimal training?
    Esfandiari S, Lund JP, Thomason JM, Dufresne E, Kobayashi T, Dubois M, Feine JS.
    J Dent; 2006 Nov; 34(10):796-801. PubMed ID: 16600463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. A prospective study on immediate loading of implants with mandibular overdentures: patient-mediated and economic outcomes.
    Attard NJ, Laporte A, Locker D, Zarb GA.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006 Nov; 19(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 16479763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM, Thompson GA, Agar JR, Taylor TD, Perdikis D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.