These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

644 related items for PubMed ID: 12182296

  • 1. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
    Akça K, Iplikçioğlu H, Cehreli MC.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G, Okamura M, Muñoz CA.
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y, Yamashita J, Shotwell JL, Chong KH, Wang HL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE, Richards LC, Abbott JR.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
    Güncü MB, Cakan U, Canay S.
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Michalakis K, Pissiotis AL, Kang K, Hirayama H, Garefis PD, Petridis H.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Oct; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS, Agar JR, Duncan JP, Taylor TD.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001 Oct; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
    Mehl C, Harder S, Wolfart M, Kern M, Wolfart S.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
    Lewinstein I, Block L, Lehr Z, Ormianer Z, Matalon S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study.
    Santosa RE, Martin W, Morton D.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Dec; 25(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 21197491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Short-term retention properties of cements for retrievable implant-supported prostheses.
    Alfaro MA, Papazoglou E, McGlumphy EA, Holloway JA.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15058180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effect of recementation on crown retention.
    Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Woelfel JB.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998 Mar; 11(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9709609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV, Conrad R, Engelmeier RL, Gerngross P, Paravina R, Perezous L, Powers JM.
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J, Soliva-Garriga J, Campillo-Funollet M, Munoz-Viveros CA, Giner-Tarrida L.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Oct; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P, Pujari M, Prithviraj DR, Khare S.
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Retention of zirconia copings on zirconia implant abutments cemented with provisional luting agents.
    Kokubo Y, Kano T, Tsumita M, Sakurai S, Itayama A, Fukushima S.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19849775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Retention of gold alloy crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements.
    Pinzón LM, Frey GN, Winkler MM, Tate WH, Burgess JO, Powers JM.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009 Jan; 22(4):351-3. PubMed ID: 19639070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Michalakis KX, Pissiotis AL, Hirayama H.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000 Jan; 15(4):545-9. PubMed ID: 10960988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Retention forces and seating discrepancies of implant-retained castings after cementation.
    Wolfart M, Wolfart S, Kern M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 Jan; 21(4):519-25. PubMed ID: 16955601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P, Gultekin BA, Aydin M, Yalcin S.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.