These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

279 related items for PubMed ID: 12184901

  • 1. Training in laparoscopic suturing skills using a new computer-based virtual reality simulator (MIST-VR) provides results comparable to those with an established pelvic trainer system.
    Kothari SN, Kaplan BJ, DeMaria EJ, Broderick TJ, Merrell RC.
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2002 Jun; 12(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 12184901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying.
    Pearson AM, Gallagher AG, Rosser JC, Satava RM.
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Jan; 16(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 11961623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Curriculum-based solo virtual reality training for laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying: objective assessment of the transfer of skill from virtual reality to reality.
    Munz Y, Almoudaris AM, Moorthy K, Dosis A, Liddle AD, Darzi AW.
    Am J Surg; 2007 Jun; 193(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 17512295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation.
    Botden SM, Torab F, Buzink SN, Jakimowicz JJ.
    Surg Endosc; 2008 May; 22(5):1214-22. PubMed ID: 17943369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface.
    Chaudhry A, Sutton C, Wood J, Stone R, McCloy R.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Jul; 81(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 10615201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Assessment of individual hand performance in box trainers compared to virtual reality trainers.
    Madan AK, Frantzides CT, Shervin N, Tebbit CL.
    Am Surg; 2003 Dec; 69(12):1112-4. PubMed ID: 14700302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison of 2 ex vivo training curricula for advanced laparoscopic skills: a randomized controlled trial.
    Orzech N, Palter VN, Reznick RK, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP.
    Ann Surg; 2012 May; 255(5):833-9. PubMed ID: 22504187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Attempted establishment of proficiency levels for laparoscopic performance on a national scale using simulation: the results from the 2004 SAGES Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer-Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) learning center study.
    Van Sickle KR, Ritter EM, McClusky DA, Lederman A, Baghai M, Gallagher AG, Smith CD.
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Jan; 21(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 17111280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Participants' opinions of laparoscopic training devices after a basic laparoscopic training course.
    Madan AK, Frantzides CT, Tebbit C, Quiros RM.
    Am J Surg; 2005 Jun; 189(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 15910733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills.
    Hamilton EC, Scott DJ, Fleming JB, Rege RV, Laycock R, Bergen PC, Tesfay ST, Jones DB.
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Mar; 16(3):406-11. PubMed ID: 11928017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Validation of a virtual intracorporeal suturing simulator.
    Fu Y, Cavuoto L, Qi D, Panneerselvam K, Yang G, Artikala VS, Enquobahrie A, De S, Schwaitzberg SD.
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Aug; 33(8):2468-2472. PubMed ID: 30334151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (MIST VR).
    Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Crothers I, Browning J.
    Endoscopy; 1999 May; 31(4):310-3. PubMed ID: 10376458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
    Botden SM, Buzink SN, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ.
    World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Desktop simulator: key to universal training?
    Bruynzeel H, de Bruin AF, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF, Hop WC, Ayodeji ID, Kazemier G.
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Sep; 21(9):1637-40. PubMed ID: 17294302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Does setting specific goals and providing feedback during training result in better acquisition of laparoscopic skills?
    Gonzalez R, Bowers SP, Smith CD, Ramshaw BJ.
    Am Surg; 2004 Jan; 70(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 14964544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The pretrained novice: using simulation-based training to improve learning in the operating room.
    Van Sickle KR, Ritter EM, Smith CD.
    Surg Innov; 2006 Sep; 13(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 17056786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Substituting virtual reality trainers for inanimate box trainers does not decrease laparoscopic skills acquisition.
    Madan AK, Frantzides CT.
    JSLS; 2007 Sep; 11(1):87-9. PubMed ID: 17651563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Trainee-Directed Virtual Reality Simulation Training and Box Trainer on the Acquisition of Laparoscopic Suturing Skills.
    Ko JKY, Cheung VYT, Pun TC, Tung WK.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Mar; 40(3):310-316. PubMed ID: 28964657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.