These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

212 related items for PubMed ID: 12195468

  • 1. Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications.
    Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Funke M, Grabbe EH.
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2188-91. PubMed ID: 12195468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study.
    Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Grabbe E.
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):478-82. PubMed ID: 12857708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM, Pisano ED, Cole EB, Zeng D, Burns CB, Roberto C, Pavic D, Lee Y, Seo BK, Koomen M, Washburn D.
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
    Peters S, Hellmich M, Stork A, Kemper J, Grinstein O, Püsken M, Stahlhut L, Kinner S, Maintz D, Krug KB.
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography].
    Diekmann S, Bick U, von Heyden H, Diekmann F.
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 12811689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of two screen-film combinations in contact and magnification mammography: detectability of microcalcifications.
    Oestmann JW, Kopans DB, Linetsky L, Hall DA, McCarthy KA, White G, Swann C, Kelley JE, Johnson LL.
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):657-9. PubMed ID: 3406394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Full-field digital mammography: dose-dependent detectability of breast lesions and microcalcinosis].
    Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Schorn C, Fischer U, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):1052-6. PubMed ID: 11199434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Full-field digital mammography: a phantom study for detection of microcalcification].
    Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Schorn C, Funke M, Fischer U, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 2000 Jul; 172(7):646-50. PubMed ID: 10962993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
    Higashida Y, Hatemura M, Yoshida A, Takada T, Takahashi M.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
    Funke M, Breiter N, Hermann KP, Oestmann JW, Grabbe E.
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: a receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images.
    Shaw CC, Wang T, King JL, Breitenstein DS, Chang TS, Harris KM, Baratz AB, Ganott MA, Reginella R, Sumkin JH, Gur D.
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9522883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography: image contrast and lesion characterization.
    Yamada T, Ishibashi T, Sato A, Saito M, Saito H, Matsuhashi T, Takahashi S.
    Radiat Med; 2003 Mar; 21(4):166-71. PubMed ID: 14514123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: comparison in the patients with microcalcifications.
    Kim HS, Han BK, Choo KS, Jeon YH, Kim JH, Choe YH.
    Korean J Radiol; 2005 Mar; 6(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 16374078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
    Funke M, Hermann KP, Breiter N, Hundertmark C, Sachs J, Gruhl T, Sperner W, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography.
    Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E.
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Nov; 12(11):2679-83. PubMed ID: 12386757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
    Gaspard-Bakhach S, Dilhuydy MH, Bonichon F, Barreau B, Henriques C, Maugey-Laulom B.
    J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Film-screen magnification versus electronic magnification and enhancement of digitized contact mammograms in the assessment of subtle microcalcifications.
    Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Kontogiannis E, Gourtsoyiannis N.
    Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):726-33. PubMed ID: 11753144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.