These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
116 related items for PubMed ID: 12195761
1. Breast microcalcifications studied with 3D contrast-enhanced high-field magnetic resonance imaging: more accuracy in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Trecate G, Tess JD, Vergnaghi D, Bergonzi S, De Simone T, Mariani G, Musumeci R. Tumori; 2002; 88(3):224-33. PubMed ID: 12195761 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial. Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, Panizza P, Del Frate C, Soldano F, Isola M, Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Simonetti G, Lattanzio V, Del Maschio A. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS. Kim JS, Lee SM, Cha ES. Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Bowsley SJ, Carleton PJ, Fox JN, Turnbull LW, Horsman A. Invest Radiol; 1995 Nov; 30(11):650-62. PubMed ID: 8557506 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiation of benign from malignant breast disease associated with screening detected microcalcifications using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Kneeshaw PJ, Lowry M, Manton D, Hubbard A, Drew PJ, Turnbull LW. Breast; 2006 Feb; 15(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 16002292 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-phase dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging with two-way subtraction. Choi N, Han BK, Choe YH, Kim HS. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005 Feb; 29(6):834-41. PubMed ID: 16272861 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography? Akita A, Tanimoto A, Jinno H, Kameyama K, Kuribayashi S. Eur Radiol; 2009 Sep; 19(9):2089-96. PubMed ID: 19350244 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnosis of infraclinical lesions of the breast with dynamic MRI: results of a prospective and multicenter study]. Gilles R, Meunier M, Trouffléau P, Divano L, Tardivon A, Vanel D, Hacourt A, Neuenschwander S, Stinès J. J Radiol; 1997 Apr; 78(4):293-7. PubMed ID: 9239364 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI in mammographically detected BI-RADS 5 microcalcifications. Houserkova D, Prasad SN, Svach I, Kucerova L, Duskova M, Bucil J, Sisola I, Zlamalova N, Svebisova H. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2008 Jun; 152(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 18795084 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnostic value of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast]. Winnekendonk G, Krug B, Warm M, Göhring UJ, Mallmann P, Lackner K. Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 15122467 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic performance of ADC for Non-mass-like breast lesions on MR imaging. Imamura T, Isomoto I, Sueyoshi E, Yano H, Uga T, Abe K, Hayashi T, Honda S, Yamaguchi T, Uetani M. Magn Reson Med Sci; 2010 May; 9(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 21187691 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]