These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
241 related items for PubMed ID: 12213058
1. DrugScore meets CoMFA: adaptation of fields for molecular comparison (AFMoC) or how to tailor knowledge-based pair-potentials to a particular protein. Gohlke H, Klebe G. J Med Chem; 2002 Sep 12; 45(19):4153-70. PubMed ID: 12213058 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. New approach to pharmacophore mapping and QSAR analysis using inductive logic programming. Application to thermolysin inhibitors and glycogen phosphorylase B inhibitors. Marchand-Geneste N, Watson KA, Alsberg BK, King RD. J Med Chem; 2002 Jan 17; 45(2):399-409. PubMed ID: 11784144 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. AFMoC enhances predictivity of 3D QSAR: a case study with DOXP-reductoisomerase. Silber K, Heidler P, Kurz T, Klebe G. J Med Chem; 2005 May 19; 48(10):3547-63. PubMed ID: 15887963 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving binding mode predictions by docking into protein-specifically adapted potential fields. Radestock S, Böhm M, Gohlke H. J Med Chem; 2005 Aug 25; 48(17):5466-79. PubMed ID: 16107145 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction. Velec HF, Gohlke H, Klebe G. J Med Chem; 2005 Oct 06; 48(20):6296-303. PubMed ID: 16190756 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship of angiotesin-converting enzyme and thermolysin inhibitors. II. A comparison of CoMFA models incorporating molecular orbital fields and desolvation free energies based on active-analog and complementary-receptor-field alignment rules. Waller CL, Marshall GR. J Med Chem; 1993 Aug 06; 36(16):2390-403. PubMed ID: 8360884 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Consensus adaptation of fields for molecular comparison (AFMoC) models incorporate ligand and receptor conformational variability into tailor-made scoring functions. Breu B, Silber K, Gohlke H. J Chem Inf Model; 2007 Aug 06; 47(6):2383-400. PubMed ID: 17958410 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of variable docking conditions and scoring functions on corresponding protein-aligned comparative molecular field analysis models constructed from diverse human protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitors. Taha MO, AlDamen MA. J Med Chem; 2005 Dec 15; 48(25):8016-34. PubMed ID: 16335926 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Receptor-based 3D QSAR analysis of estrogen receptor ligands--merging the accuracy of receptor-based alignments with the computational efficiency of ligand-based methods. Sippl W. J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2000 Aug 15; 14(6):559-72. PubMed ID: 10921772 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of designed ligands by a multiple screening method: application to glycogen phosphorylase inhibitors constructed with a variety of approaches. So SS, Karplus M. J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2001 Jul 15; 15(7):613-47. PubMed ID: 11688944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Binding interaction analysis of the active site and its inhibitors for neuraminidase (N1 subtype) of human influenza virus by the integration of molecular docking, FMO calculation and 3D-QSAR CoMFA modeling. Zhang Q, Yang J, Liang K, Feng L, Li S, Wan J, Xu X, Yang G, Liu D, Yang S. J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep 15; 48(9):1802-12. PubMed ID: 18707092 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]