These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
344 related items for PubMed ID: 12215086
1. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms. Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR. Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 12215086 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects. Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR. Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and full threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field loss. Aoki Y, Takahashi G, Kitahara K. Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 17(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 17415692 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm for central visual field defects unrelated to nerve fiber layer. Hirasawa K, Shoji N. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):845-54. PubMed ID: 26279004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 24-2 Faster, Fast, and Standard Programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for Perimetry in Patients With Manifest and Suspect Glaucoma. Thulasidas M, Patyal S. J Glaucoma; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 32890104 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm compared with standard full threshold algorithm in Humphrey visual field testing. Sekhar GC, Naduvilath TJ, Lakkai M, Jayakumar AJ, Pandi GT, Mandal AK, Honavar SG. Ophthalmology; 2000 Jul; 107(7):1303-8. PubMed ID: 10889102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc. Sakata LM, Deleon-Ortega J, Arthur SN, Monheit BE, Girkin CA. Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1999 Apr; 77(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 10321527 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 30-2 Standard and Fast programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for perimetry in patients with intracranial tumors. Singh MD, Jain K. Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 65(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 29133651 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]