These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


230 related items for PubMed ID: 12216631

  • 41. Biofilm development in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor: effect of flow velocity on performance.
    Casey E, Glennon B, Hamer G.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2000 Feb 20; 67(4):476-86. PubMed ID: 10620763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Modeling the development of biofilm density including active bacteria, inert biomass, and extracellular polymeric substances.
    Laspidou CS, Rittmann BE.
    Water Res; 2004 Feb 20; 38(14-15):3349-61. PubMed ID: 15276752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. A dual-growth kinetic model for biological wastewater reactors.
    Chang HT, Parulekar SJ, Ahmed M.
    Biotechnol Prog; 2005 Feb 20; 21(2):423-31. PubMed ID: 15801781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Assessment of three-dimensional biofilm models through direct comparison with confocal microscopy imaging.
    Xavier JB, Picioreanu C, van Loosdrecht MC.
    Water Sci Technol; 2004 Feb 20; 49(11-12):177-85. PubMed ID: 15303739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. The effect of flow pattern on kinetic characteristic of the biomass fixed inside porous medium.
    Matsui Y, Deguchi H.
    Water Sci Technol; 2002 Feb 20; 46(1-2):419-22. PubMed ID: 12216660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Nitritation performance in membrane-aerated biofilm reactors differs from conventional biofilm systems.
    Lackner S, Terada A, Horn H, Henze M, Smets BF.
    Water Res; 2010 Dec 20; 44(20):6073-84. PubMed ID: 20801477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Low-biodegradable composite chemical wastewater treatment by biofilm configured sequencing batch reactor (SBBR).
    Mohan SV, Rao NC, Sarma PN.
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jun 01; 144(1-2):108-17. PubMed ID: 17097228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Bioreactor scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: an overview.
    Garcia-Ochoa F, Gomez E.
    Biotechnol Adv; 2009 Jun 01; 27(2):153-76. PubMed ID: 19041387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Modeling and simulation of competition between two microorganisms for a single inhibitory substrate in a biofilm reactor.
    Soda S, Heinzle E, Fujita M.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1999 Jun 01; 66(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 10578096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Competition between planktonic and fixed microorganisms during the start-up of methanogenic biofilm reactors.
    Cresson R, Escudié R, Steyer JP, Delgenès JP, Bernet N.
    Water Res; 2008 Feb 01; 42(3):792-800. PubMed ID: 17825351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.