These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

156 related items for PubMed ID: 12225408

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Oak moss extracts in the diagnosis of fragrance contact allergy.
    Johansen JD, Heydorn S, Menné T.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Mar; 46(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 12000325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Contact sensitization to tree moss (Evernia furfuracea extract, INCI) is heterogeneous.
    Uter W, Schmidt E, Lessmann H, Schnuch A.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Jul; 67(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22486592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Fragrant and sticky allergens from the pinewood: Cohabiting and coreacting.
    Paulsen E, Andersen F.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Nov; 81(5):374-377. PubMed ID: 31281968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Reduced content of chloroatranol and atranol in oak moss absolute significantly reduces the elicitation potential of this fragrance material.
    Andersen F, Andersen KH, Bernois A, Brault C, Bruze M, Eudes H, Gadras C, Signoret AC, Mose KF, Müller BP, Toulemonde B, Andersen KE.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Feb; 72(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 25395354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Patch testing with serial dilutions and thin-layer chromatograms of oak moss absolutes containing high and low levels of atranol and chloroatranol.
    Mowitz M, Zimerson E, Svedman C, Bruze M.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Dec; 69(6):342-9. PubMed ID: 24102141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Contact allergy to oak moss: search for sensitizing molecules using combined bioassay-guided chemical fractionation, GC-MS, and structure-activity relationship analysis.
    Bernard G, Giménez-Arnau E, Rastogi SC, Heydorn S, Johansen JD, Menné T, Goossens A, Andersen K, Lepoittevin JP.
    Arch Dermatol Res; 2003 Nov; 295(6):229-35. PubMed ID: 13680271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The significance of fragrance mix, balsam of Peru, colophony and propolis as screening tools in the detection of fragrance allergy.
    Wöhrl S, Hemmer W, Focke M, Götz M, Jarisch R.
    Br J Dermatol; 2001 Aug; 145(2):268-73. PubMed ID: 11531790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Usage tests of oak moss absolutes containing high and low levels of atranol and chloroatranol.
    Mowitz M, Svedman C, Zimerson E, Bruze M.
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2014 Jul; 94(4):398-402. PubMed ID: 24287679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The significance of batch and patch test method in establishing contact allergy to fragrance mix I-EDEN Fragrance Study Group.
    Bruze M, Mowitz M, Ofenloch R, Coenraads PJ, Diepgen TL, Elsner P, Gonçalo M, Naldi L, Svensson Å.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Aug; 81(2):104-109. PubMed ID: 30810228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Colophony allergy: a review.
    Downs AM, Sansom JE.
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Dec; 41(6):305-10. PubMed ID: 10617209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Accuracy of questions related to allergic contact dermatitis.
    Fleming CJ, Burden AD, Forsyth A.
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Dec; 11(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 11123414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Propolis, Colophony, and Fragrance Cross-Reactivity and Allergic Contact Dermatitis.
    Shi Y, Nedorost S, Scheman L, Scheman A.
    Dermatitis; 2016 Dec; 27(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 27172306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The frequency of fragrance allergy in a patch-test population over a 17-year period.
    Buckley DA, Wakelin SH, Seed PT, Holloway D, Rycroft RJ, White IR, McFadden JP.
    Br J Dermatol; 2000 Feb; 142(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 10730761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of elicitation potential of chloroatranol and atranol--2 allergens in oak moss absolute.
    Johansen JD, Bernard G, Giménez-Arnau E, Lepoittevin JP, Bruze M, Andersen KE.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Apr; 54(4):192-5. PubMed ID: 16650093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Contact allergy to colophony. Clinical and experimental studies with emphasis on clinical relevance.
    Färm G.
    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1998 Apr; 201():1-42. PubMed ID: 9833065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.