These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

341 related items for PubMed ID: 12234232

  • 1. Inconsistency in evidentiary standards for medical testimony: disorder in the courts.
    Kassirer JP, Cecil JS.
    JAMA; 2002 Sep 18; 288(11):1382-7. PubMed ID: 12234232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J, Lin JR.
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul 18; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH, Friedman HJ.
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001 Jul 18; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Risk assessment in the law: legal admissibility, scientific validity, and some disparities between research and practice.
    Krauss DA, Scurich N.
    Behav Sci Law; 2013 Jul 18; 31(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 23613165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The case against differential diagnosis: Daubert, medical causation testimony, and the scientific method.
    Hollingsworth JG, Lasker EG.
    J Health Law; 2004 Jul 18; 37(1):85-111. PubMed ID: 15191237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA.
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct 18; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A hybrid decision framework for evaluating psychometric evidence.
    Marlowe DB.
    Behav Sci Law; 1995 Oct 18; 13(2):207-28. PubMed ID: 10150377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael.
    Grudzinskas AJ.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999 Oct 18; 27(3):482-8. PubMed ID: 10509947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The admissibility of hypnotic evidence in U.S. Courts.
    Giannelli PC.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Apr 18; 43(2):212-33. PubMed ID: 7737764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Mild traumatic brain injury: Is DTI ready for the courtroom?
    Shenton ME, Price BH, Levin L, Edersheim JG.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018 Apr 18; 61():50-63. PubMed ID: 30391039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Neuropsychologists diagnose traumatic brain injury.
    Wade JB, DeMatteo D, Hart RP.
    Brain Inj; 2004 Jul 18; 18(7):629-43. PubMed ID: 15204325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.