These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

126 related items for PubMed ID: 12238808

  • 1. Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in rats.
    Nary Filho H, Matsumoto MA, Batista AC, Lopes LC, de Góes FC, Consolaro A.
    Braz Dent J; 2002; 13(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12238808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparative study of three different membranes for guided bone regeneration of rat cranial defects.
    Dupoirieux L, Pourquier D, Picot MC, Neves M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Feb; 30(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 11289623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of two suture materials for intradermal skin closure in dogs.
    Kirpensteijn J, Maarschalkerweerd RJ, Koeman JP, Kooistra HS, van Sluijs FJ.
    Vet Q; 1997 Mar; 19(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 9225425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Glycol methacrylate: an alternative method for embedding subcutaneous implants.
    Gomes-Filho JE, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Novaes PD, Souza-Filho FJ.
    J Endod; 2001 Apr; 27(4):266-8. PubMed ID: 11485264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Popularity of suture materials among residents and faculty members of a postdoctoral periodontology program.
    Maksoud M, Koo S, Barouch K, Karimbux N.
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Feb; 5(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 23595981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Histological evaluation of biodegradable and non-degradable membranes placed transcutaneously in rats.
    Galgut P, Pitrola R, Waite I, Doyle C, Smith R.
    J Clin Periodontol; 1991 Sep; 18(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1795054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Biocompatibility evaluation of biodentine in subcutaneous tissue of rats.
    Mori GG, Teixeira LM, de Oliveira DL, Jacomini LM, da Silva SR.
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1485-8. PubMed ID: 25146039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparative study on biocompatibility and absorption times of three absorbable monofilament suture materials (Polydioxanone, Poliglecaprone 25, Glycomer 631).
    Molea G, Schonauer F, Bifulco G, D'Angelo D.
    Br J Plast Surg; 2000 Mar; 53(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 10878837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Tissue reaction and surface morphology of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure.
    Andrade MG, Weissman R, Reis SR.
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2006 Oct; 17(10):949-61. PubMed ID: 16977393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.