These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

243 related items for PubMed ID: 12239758

  • 1. Prospective randomised study of cephalic vein cut-down versus subclavian vein puncture technique in the implantation of subcutaneous venous access devices.
    D'Angelo FA, Ramacciato G, Aurello P, De Angelis R, Amodio P, Magrì M, Barillari P.
    Chir Ital; 2002; 54(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 12239758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Totally implantable venous access systems. Analysis of complications].
    D'Angelo F, Ramacciato G, Caramitti A, Aurello P, Lauro S, Bordin F, Della Casa U.
    Minerva Chir; 1997; 52(7-8):937-42. PubMed ID: 9411296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prospective randomised study of cephalic vein cut-down versus subclavian vein puncture. Technique in the implantation of subcutaneous venous access devices.
    D'Angelo FA.
    Chir Ital; 2003; 55(2):313. PubMed ID: 12744114
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Venous cutdown versus the Seldinger technique for placement of totally implantable venous access ports.
    Hsu CC, Kwan GN, Evans-Barns H, Rophael JA, van Driel ML.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug 21; 2016(8):CD008942. PubMed ID: 27544827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Totally implantable venous access ports by cephalic vein cut-down for patients receiving chemotherapy].
    Ayadi S, Ksantini R, Maghrebi H, Daghfous A, Ayadi M, Fteriche F, Bedioui H, Chebbi F, Amous A, Jouini M, Kacem M, Mezlini A, Ben Safta Z.
    Tunis Med; 2011 Aug 21; 89(8-9):699-702. PubMed ID: 21948685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Complications after insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in patients treated with chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].
    Hoareau-Gruchet F, Rtail R, Sulaj H, Khirnetkina A, Reyt E, Righini CA.
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Apr 21; 126(2):43-52. PubMed ID: 19324328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Experience of anesthesiologists with percutaneous nonangiographic venous access.
    Chen PT, Sung CS, Wang CC, Chan KH, Chang WK, Hsu WH.
    J Clin Anesth; 2007 Dec 21; 19(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 18083475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Prospective randomized trial comparing implantation of subcutaneous indwelling venous access devices by the cephalic vein cutdown (CVC) approach versus the percutaneous subclavian vein (PSV) approach.
    Povoski SP, Young DC.
    Chir Ital; 2003 Dec 21; 55(1):149-50. PubMed ID: 12633056
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Modification of approach for totally implantable venous access device decreases rate of complications.
    Karanlik H, Kurul S.
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Sep 01; 100(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 19582820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Venous access and long-term pacemaker lead failure: comparing contrast-guided axillary vein puncture with subclavian puncture and cephalic cutdown.
    Chan NY, Kwong NP, Cheong AP.
    Europace; 2017 Jul 01; 19(7):1193-1197. PubMed ID: 27733455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Radiological and surgical placement of port devices: a 4-year institutional analysis of procedure performance, quality of life and cost in breast cancer patients.
    Marcy PY, Magné N, Castadot P, Bailet C, Macchiavello JC, Namer M, Gallard JC.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Jul 01; 92(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 15980992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cost effectiveness of different central venous approaches for port placement and use in adult oncology patients: evidence from a randomized three-arm trial.
    Biffi R, Pozzi S, Bonomo G, Della Vigna P, Monfardini L, Radice D, Rotmensz N, Zampino MG, Fazio N, Orsi F.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Nov 01; 21(12):3725-31. PubMed ID: 24841352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. US-guided placement of central vein catheters in patients with disorders of hemostasis.
    Tercan F, Ozkan U, Oguzkurt L.
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb 01; 65(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 17482407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.