These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

161 related items for PubMed ID: 12257657

  • 1. Many state Medicaid agencies limit payment for abortion, sterilization.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Aug; 2(4):82-3. PubMed ID: 12257657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Medicaid in FY 78: states fund abortions, U.S. covers other family planning services.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Apr; 9(2):28-34. PubMed ID: 12336219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Surveying outpatient services in the Southwest.
    Rich M.
    AVSC News; 1989 Apr; 27(1):4, 6. PubMed ID: 12315715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Illinois, Massachusetts: governors veto restrictions on state funds for abortion.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Oct; 6(5):57-9. PubMed ID: 12308832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. 2 states sued for not paying for abortions for poor.
    Denniston L.
    Sun; 1994 Apr 05; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12288300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Over two-thirds of fertility-related state laws enacted in 1979 regulate abortion.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Feb 05; 9(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 12278415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Legislative record: state legislatures--1973 bills.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr 05; 2(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 12307104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. State Medicaid abortion policies continue to be challenged; courts reach varying conclusions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug 05; 8(4):42-4. PubMed ID: 12309465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. County can't limit abortion funding more than state (New York).
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Oct 08; 7(5):80. PubMed ID: 12260860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Grant recipients' rights in question.
    Willson PD.
    Plan Parent Rev; 1984 Oct 08; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Public Law No. 101-167 of 21 November 1989, Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1990.
    United States.
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989 Oct 08; 16():37. PubMed ID: 12344400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Proposed Title 20 rules could jeopardize delivery of family planning services.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Jun 08; 4(3):47-8. PubMed ID: 12307551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Alabama: city's comprehensive abortion rules invalid.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Jun 08; 6(3):34. PubMed ID: 12259980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Regulation and the optimal size and type of abortion provider.
    Haas-wilson D, Lindberg K.
    Appl Econ; 1999 Apr 08; 31(4):409-15. PubMed ID: 12295468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The Milwaukee story: a public hospital's resistance to the Supreme Court abortion rulings.
    Ambrose L.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Aug 08; 4(4):68-72. PubMed ID: 12334289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.