These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

171 related items for PubMed ID: 1228088

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Results of early diagnosis of cervix carcinoma between 1962-1968].
    Kohl H.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1970 May 30; 92(22):691-9. PubMed ID: 5513142
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Estrogenic effect in vaginal smears in cases of carcinoma in situ and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Rubio CA.
    Acta Cytol; 1973 May 30; 17(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 4198740
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Experience of a cyto-diagnostic laboratory (author's transl)].
    Kern-Bontke E, Gräfin zu Eulenburg H.
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1974 Feb 30; 34(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 4545208
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Computer recognition of cell nuclei from the uterine cervix.
    Bibbo M, Bartels PH, Bahr GF, Taylor J, Wied GL.
    Acta Cytol; 1973 Feb 30; 17(4):340-50. PubMed ID: 4579185
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. False positive cervical smears: a cytometric and histological study.
    Nenning H, Horn LC, Kühndel K, Bilek K.
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Jul 30; 9(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 7577756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of pipette and smear methods in population screenings for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Klinken L, Koch F, Albrechtsen R.
    Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun 30; 19(4):138-40. PubMed ID: 5041571
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Cytological classifications of vaginal smears. Current concepts of complex cytodiagnosis].
    Kasabova M.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1984 Jun 30; 23(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 6385754
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Diagnosis in preinvasive lesions of the cervix.
    Karjalainen O, Järvilehto U, Nieminen U, Timonen S.
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974 Jun 30; 63(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 4851356
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cervical biopsy versus conization.
    Selim MA, So-Bosita JL, Blair OM, Little BA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Feb 30; 41(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 4684200
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Cytological findings of precancerous lesion and early cancer in the uterine cervix (author's transl)].
    Kurihara S.
    Rinsho Byori; 1976 Feb 30; 24(6):446-51. PubMed ID: 988262
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cervix correlated cyto-histological study.
    Gupta S, Rao MC, Gupta IM, Gupta YN, Khanna S, Sanyal SK, Prakash A.
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1979 Apr 30; 22(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 489088
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The occurrence of isolated dysplastic and carcinoma in situ type cells in cervical smears from patients with dysplasia and carcinoma in situ: significance to prescreening using image processing techniques.
    Feldman M, Poulsen R, Shepherd L, Marshall KG.
    Acta Cytol; 1973 Apr 30; 17(5):395-400. PubMed ID: 4517951
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A diagnostic and follow-up program for patients in the 20-34 year age group with suspicious cervical smears.
    Bjersing L, Holmberg NG, Lundström P, Magnússon SS, Segerbrand E, Angström T.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1971 Apr 30; 9():Suppl 9:78. PubMed ID: 5287134
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.