These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

761 related items for PubMed ID: 12284280

  • 1. Use of IUDs in developing countries: a comparative study.
    Farr G, Burdan A.
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1991 Sep; 12(2):6-8, 12. PubMed ID: 12284280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A bright future for IUDS: new technology and research trigger expanded interest.
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1991 Sep; 12(2):1, 4-5. PubMed ID: 12284272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Acceptability of IUDs is increasing.
    Finger WR, Barr D.
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 12286082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Randomized clinical study of the TCu-380 A and the TCu-200 B. IUDs.
    Kandil OF, El-sheikha Z, Hamza A.
    Popul Sci; 1991 Jan; 10():35-40. PubMed ID: 12284660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO, Otolorin EO, Ladipo OA.
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A randomized comparative trial of the Lippes Loop D, Gravigard and TCu 220C IUDs.
    Mccarthy TG, Lim LS, Chew SC, Heng SH, Ratnam SS.
    Adv Contracept Deliv Syst; 1985 Mar; (1):113-21. PubMed ID: 12267106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
    Forrest JD.
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A study of the characteristics of acceptors of copper-T device: compared to other IUDs.
    Kohli BR, Goel OP, Roy S.
    J Popul Res; 1976 Mar; 3(2):16-28. PubMed ID: 12259620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Intrauterine devices. The optimal long-term contraceptive method?
    Fortney JA, Feldblum PJ, Raymond EG.
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Mar; 44(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 10202746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 39.