These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

127 related items for PubMed ID: 12316798

  • 1. Norplant's high cost may prohibit use in Title 10 clinics.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Apr; 12(4):49-52. PubMed ID: 12316798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A patchwork of funding sources for Norplant users in the U.S.
    Antarsh L.
    AVSC News; 1992 Sep; 30(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12285829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Hearing focuses on price of Norplant; Wyeth pledges discount for public sector.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Nov 23; (18):3-4. PubMed ID: 12318533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Wyeth-Ayerst to reduce U.S. price of Norplant implants, but not until December 1995. Family planners outraged.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1994 Jan 23; 15(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12319213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Norplant debate: dollars v. sense. Is Norplant discount in U.S. too little, too late?
    Family Plan World; 1994 Jan 23; 4(1):1, 12. PubMed ID: 12318850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinics: Norplant cost chokes services.
    Family Plan World; 1993 Jan 23; 3(5):1, 28. PubMed ID: 12319135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Arrival of Norplant may be bittersweet for clinics.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jan 23; 12(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12283523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinics struggle with high Norplant costs.
    Family Plan World; 1993 Jan 23; 3(6):23, 29. PubMed ID: 12319106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Private sector joins family planning effort.
    Front Lines; 1989 Dec 23; ():6, 13. PubMed ID: 12343476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Norplant may be too costly for low income women.
    Family Plan World; 1991 Dec 23; ():7, 14. PubMed ID: 12346943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Special report... Norplant -- one year later.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Dec 20; (20):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12343466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinicians, patients, Medicaid: is anyone to blame for Norplant removal dilemma? Part II.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1993 Oct 20; 14(10):149-53. PubMed ID: 12286902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Surveying outpatient services in the Southwest.
    Rich M.
    AVSC News; 1989 Apr 20; 27(1):4, 6. PubMed ID: 12315715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Economic woes mean cuts to family planning services.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul 20; 12(7):104, 109-10. PubMed ID: 12284064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Suspension of IUD sales in the United States: what are the international implications?].
    Ramirez FJ, Starrs AM.
    Perspect Int Planif Fam; 1987 Jul 20; (Spec No):28-34. PubMed ID: 12269049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Title X family planning clinics confront escalating costs, increasing needs.
    Dailard C.
    Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1999 Apr 20; 2(2):1-2, 14. PubMed ID: 12349122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Implanted protection. Women slowly turn to Norplant use.
    Kobren G.
    Sun; 1991 Jul 16; ():1C, 5C. PubMed ID: 12290563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.