These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

445 related items for PubMed ID: 12317715

  • 1. Reproductive rights in jeopardy. The Supreme Court upholds restrictions on abortion.
    Gleeson K.
    ZPG Report; 1992 Sep; 24(4):7. PubMed ID: 12317715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992 Sep; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Bare court majority reaffirms Roe, but standard for reviewing state laws is relaxed.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul 02; (11):1-3. PubMed ID: 12286280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. New abortion laws introduce informed and parental consent.
    Family Plan World; 1991 Jul 02; 1(2):25. PubMed ID: 12284517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J.
    Womens Health Issues; 1993 Jul 02; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Supreme Court bars mandatory parental role in minors' abortions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug 02; 8(4):37-9. PubMed ID: 12278191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Legislating family relationships.
    Gleeson K.
    ZPG Report; 1991 Sep 02; 23(4):7. PubMed ID: 12284469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Reproductive health care and minors' rights.
    Paul EW, Klassel D.
    Plan Parent Rev; 1984 Sep 02; 4(2):20-1. PubMed ID: 12339889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. High court gives states more freedom to require consent in teen abortions.
    Denniston L.
    Sun; 1993 Nov 16; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12345223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Abortion and the law: the Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion.
    Marsh FH.
    Adv Bioeth; 1997 Nov 16; 2():107-23. PubMed ID: 12348324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. FOCA, funding on center stage to test new dynamic in abortion politics.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jan 12; (1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
    Koslov TI.
    Law Med Health Care; 1992 Jan 12; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. High court hears clinic blockade case, as appeals court upholds abortion law.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Oct 31; (17):2-3. PubMed ID: 12284473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
    Denniston L.
    Sun; 1992 Aug 07; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Supreme Court refuses South Dakota appeal in parental notice case.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1996 May 03; 5(9):2. PubMed ID: 12291324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
    Haas-Wilson D.
    J Policy Anal Manage; 1993 May 03; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinton repeals antiabortion policies as activists map out new strategies.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Feb 09; (3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.