These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1040 related items for PubMed ID: 12344741

  • 1. Financing family planning services: is categorical legislation still needed?
    Mcfarlane DR, Meier KJ.
    Am J Gynecol Health; 1991; 5(5-6):130-7. PubMed ID: 12344741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.
    Nestor B, Gold RB.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 6432576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.
    Sollom T, Gold RB, Saul R.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Veto -- or threat thereof -- prevails over majority as 102nd Congress adjourns.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Oct 12; (15):2-4. PubMed ID: 12317790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. From the world beyond Washington. The states and fertility-related laws: an analysis at mid-year.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1987 Aug 18; ():4-6. PubMed ID: 12281329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. "Financing Family Planning Services: Is Categorical Legislation Still Needed?".
    Kring TC.
    Am J Gynecol Health; 1992 Aug 18; 6(2):58. PubMed ID: 12317964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. More family planning and abortion services needed.
    Gold R.
    Plan Parent Rev; 1984 Aug 18; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 12267090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Family planning funding through four federal-state programs, FY 1997.
    Gold RB, Sonfield A.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999 Aug 18; 31(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 10435216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. "Financing Family Planning Services: Is Categorical Legislation Still Needed?" Drs. McFarlane and Meier Respond.
    Mcfarlane DR, Meier KJ.
    Am J Gynecol Health; 1992 Aug 18; 6(2):58-9. PubMed ID: 12317965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Public funding of contraceptive services, 1980-1982.
    Nestor B.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1982 Aug 18; 14(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 6811312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Public funding for U.S. contraceptive services down since 1980 -- $95 million a year goes to sterilization.
    Sukop S.
    AVSC News; 1992 Mar 18; 30(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 12285114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Gag rule provision intact as conferees complete work on HHS funding bill. Abortion funding, parental notice dropped.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Oct 31; (17):1-2. PubMed ID: 12284472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Grant recipients' rights in question.
    Willson PD.
    Plan Parent Rev; 1984 Oct 31; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Family planning needs: an empirical study of federal responsiveness before and during the Reagan administration.
    Mcfarlane DR.
    J Prim Prev; 1988 Oct 31; 9(1-2):41-56. PubMed ID: 12281989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The provision of public-sector services by family planning agencies in 1995.
    Frost JJ, Bolzan M.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1997 Oct 31; 29(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 9119045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Bill to reauthorize Title X, overturn gag rule is sent to president.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Sep 22; (14):1-2. PubMed ID: 12317776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.
    Forrest JD, Samara R.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996 Sep 22; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. House passes Title X renewal bill, but veto expected and override uncertain.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 May 05; (8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12317346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 52.