These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

456 related items for PubMed ID: 12361209

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
    Palmans H, Nafaa L, de Patoul N, Denis JM, Tomsej M, Vynckier S.
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 May 07; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H, Nafaa L, De JJ, Gillis S, Hoornaert MT, Martens C, Piessens M, Thierens H, Van der Plaetsen A, Vynckier S.
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb 07; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Reference dose determination in 60Co and high-energy radiotherapy photon beams by using Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers - an experimental investigation.
    Swanpalmer J.
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 May 06; 6(4):045003. PubMed ID: 33444264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC, Hanson WF.
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul 06; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Determination of absorbed dose to water for high energy photon and electron beams--comparison of different dosimetry protocols].
    Zakaria GA, Schütte W.
    Z Med Phys; 2003 Jul 06; 13(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 14732959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Ionization chamber dosimetry of proton beams using cylindrical and plane parallel chambers. Nw versus Nk ion chamber calibrations.
    Medin J, Andreo P, Grusell E, Mattsson O, Montelius A, Roos M.
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jul 06; 40(7):1161-76. PubMed ID: 7568375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of linear accelerator photon outputs from the IAEA TRS-398 and TRS-277 codes of practice.
    Fourie OL.
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Mar 06; 31(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 18488961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Proton beam monitor chamber calibration.
    Gomà C, Lorentini S, Meer D, Safai S.
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Sep 07; 59(17):4961-71. PubMed ID: 25109620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.