These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
413 related items for PubMed ID: 12377909
1. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty : an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Oct; 84(10):1788-92. PubMed ID: 12377909 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dislocation rate after conversion from hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty. Sah AP, Estok DM. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Mar; 90(3):506-16. PubMed ID: 18310700 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary total hip arthroplasty revision due to dislocation: prospective French multicenter study. Girard J, Kern G, Migaud H, Delaunay C, Ramdane N, Hamadouche M, Société française de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 99(5):549-53. PubMed ID: 23890966 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision for recurrent instability: what are the predictors of failure? Carter AH, Sheehan EC, Mortazavi SM, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J. J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6 Suppl):46-52. PubMed ID: 21550768 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA associated with fewer dislocations and less muscle degeneration by preserving muscle progenitors. Hernigou P, Roussignol X, Delambre J, Poignard A, Flouzat-Lachaniette CH. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3762-9. PubMed ID: 26054482 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevention and treatment of dislocation after total hip replacement using large diameter balls. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Beaulé PE. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Dec; (429):108-16. PubMed ID: 15577474 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Early failure in total hip arthroplasty. Dobzyniak M, Fehring TK, Odum S. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jun; 447():76-8. PubMed ID: 16505710 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, Namba R, Fithian D. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jun; 447():19-23. PubMed ID: 16741469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Course of dislocated posterior hip arthroplasty: A continuous 232-patient series at a mean 10 years' follow up (range, 1-22 years). Martinot P, Blairon A, Putman S, Pasquier G, Girard J, Migaud H. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 May; 104(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 29277516 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What are the risk factors for dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty? A multicenter case-control study of 128 unstable and 438 stable hips. Fessy MH, Putman S, Viste A, Isida R, Ramdane N, Ferreira A, Leglise A, Rubens-Duval B, Bonin N, Bonnomet F, Combes A, Boisgard S, Mainard D, Leclercq S, Migaud H, SFHG. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):663-668. PubMed ID: 28629944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty. Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar 20; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of revision surgery for the dislocating total hip arthroplasty: report from a large community registry. Salassa T, Hoeffel D, Mehle S, Tatman P, Gioe TJ. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Mar 20; 472(3):962-7. PubMed ID: 24150890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Modular femoral head and liner exchange for the unstable total hip arthroplasty. Biviji AA, Ezzet KA, Pulido P, Colwell CW. J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun 20; 24(4):625-30. PubMed ID: 18534537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years. Dearborn JT, Harris WH. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr 20; 81(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 10225792 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term results of tripolar constrained total hip arthroplasty in revision hip arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of ten years. El-Husseiny M, Masri B, Duncan C, Garbuz DS. Bone Joint J; 2019 Jun 20; 101-B(6_Supple_B):123-126. PubMed ID: 31146561 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Modular revision for recurrent dislocation of primary or revision total hip arthroplasty. Lachiewicz PF, Soileau E, Ellis J. J Arthroplasty; 2004 Jun 20; 19(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 15188099 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. High Failure Rate of Modular Exchange With a Specific Design of a Constrained Liner in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Chalmers BP, Arsoy D, Sierra RJ, Lewallen DG, Trousdale RT. J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep 20; 31(9):1963-9. PubMed ID: 26975601 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with high dislocation: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of previous reports. Hartofilakidis G, Karachalios T, Georgiades G, Kourlaba G. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Sep 07; 93(17):1614-8. PubMed ID: 21915576 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Total hip arthroplasty dislocation rate following isolated cup revision using Hueter's direct anterior approach on a fracture table. Cogan A, Klouche S, Mamoudy P, Sariali E. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Sep 07; 97(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 21782540 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: to exchange or not? A 5- to 15-year follow-up study. de Thomasson E, Conso C, Mazel C. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb 07; 98(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 22245150 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]